Cited by 321Data Visualization and AnalyticsComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesScientific Computing and Data Management

Protovis: A Graphical Toolkit for Visualization

Bostock, M., Heer, J.·2009·IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Abstract

Despite myriad tools for visualizing data, there remains a gap between the notational efficiency of high-level visualization systems and the expressiveness and accessibility of low-level graphical systems. Powerful visualization systems may be inflexible or impose abstractions foreign to visual thinking, while graphical systems such as rendering APIs and vector-based drawing programs are tedious for complex work. We argue that an easy-to-use graphical system tailored for visualization is needed. In response, we contribute Protovis, an extensible toolkit for constructing visualizations by composing simple graphical primitives. In Protovis, designers specify visualizations as a hierarchy of marks with visual properties defined as functions of data. This representation achieves a level of expressiveness comparable to low-level graphics systems, while improving efficiency--the effort required to specify a visualization--and accessibility--the effort required to learn and modify the representation. We substantiate this claim through a diverse collection of examples and comparative analysis with popular visualization tools.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tvcg.2009.174

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most issues reported around incompatibility with users' choice of screen reader have been documented by prior literature throughout the past two decades or addressed by accessibility guidelines available to content creators.

    “Most issues reported around incompatibility with users' choice of screen reader have been documented by prior literature throughout the past two decades [25,72,87,90] or addressed by accessibility guidelines that are available to content creators (e.g., WCAG [7], NCAM [56], Section 508 [4]).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 36 · Cited by 321

Authors
Bostock, M., & Heer, J.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Published
2009-11
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
1121-1128
ISSN
1077-2626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098417174
Cited by
321
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 35
FWCI
29.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
Keywords
graphical primitives, vector graphics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review