Cited by 108Augmented Reality ApplicationsVisual perception and processing mechanismsInteractive and Immersive Displays

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Matching and Reaching Depth Judgments with Real and Augmented Reality Targets

Swan, J. Edward, Singh, Gurjot, Ellis, Stephen R.·2015·IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Abstract

Many compelling augmented reality (AR) applications require users to correctly perceive the location of virtual objects, some with accuracies as tight as 1 mm. However, measuring the perceived depth of AR objects at these accuracies has not yet been demonstrated. In this paper, we address this challenge by employing two different depth judgment methods, perceptual matching and blind reaching, in a series of three experiments, where observers judged the depth of real and AR target objects presented at reaching distances. Our experiments found that observers can accurately match the distance of a real target, but when viewing an AR target through collimating optics, their matches systematically overestimate the distance by 0.5 to 4.0 cm. However, these results can be explained by a model where the collimation causes the eyes' vergence angle to rotate outward by a constant angular amount. These findings give error bounds for using collimating AR displays at reaching distances, and suggest that for these applications, AR displays need to provide an adjustable focus. Our experiments further found that observers initially reach ∼4 cm too short, but reaching accuracy improves with both consistent proprioception and corrective visual feedback, and eventually becomes nearly as accurate as matching.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tvcg.2015.2459895

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 108

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00018-U · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0028-3932(91)90079-N · DOI
  3. 10.1007/BF00227302 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/VR.2012.6180933 · DOI
  5. 10.1518/001872098779591278 · DOI
  6. 10.1068/p060449 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/ISMAR.2009.5336486 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2013.01.009 · DOI
  9. levine, 1996, The Control Handbook
  10. 10.1162/105474600566583 · DOI
  11. 10.1068/p2737 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/001401300184486 · DOI
  13. mon-williams, 0, Synaes-thesia in the normal limb, Proc Royal Society ser B, 264, 1007, 10.1098/rspb.1997.0139 · DOI
  14. 10.1162/PRES_a_00048 · DOI
  15. 10.1145/1836248.1836277 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.145 · DOI
  17. singh, 2013, Near Field Depth Perception in Optical See-though Augmented Reality
  18. 10.1037/0096-1523.27.6.1314 · DOI
  19. cohen, 2003, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
  20. 10.1109/VR.2011.5759488 · DOI
  21. 10.1037/0096-1523.26.4.1436 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/B978-012240530-3/50005-5 · DOI
  23. curtis, 0, Several devils in the details: Making an AR application work in the airplane factory, Proc Int'l Workshop Augmented Reality (IWAR '99), 47
  24. anderson, 1981, Foundations of Information Integration Theory
  25. 10.1109/42.896784 · DOI
  26. 10.1145/2338676.2338691 · DOI
  27. 10.1145/2010325.2010328 · DOI
  28. paillard, 1968, Active and passive movements in the calibration of position sense, The Neuropsychology of Spatially Oriented Behavior, 37
  29. 10.3758/PBR.15.2.437 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/BF00337436 · DOI
  31. pedhazur, 1982, Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research
  32. 10.1162/105474602321050730 · DOI
  33. rolland, 1995, Towards quantifying depth and size perception in virtual environments, Presence Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 4, 24, 10.1162/pres.1995.4.1.24 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Swan, J. E., Singh, G., & Ellis, S. R.
Affiliations
  • Mississippi State University (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • Ames Research Center (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Published
2015-11-15
Volume
21
Issue
11
Pages
1289-1298
ISSN
  • 1077-2626 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0506
  • 2160-9306
OpenAlex
W1624742589
Cited by
108
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (IIS-0713609, IIS-1018413, IIS-1320909)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
Keywords
augmented reality, depth perception, perceptual matching, vergence angle, proprioception, visual feedback, reaching accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Matching and Reaching Depth Judgments with Real and Augmented Reality Targets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tvcg.2015.2459895
The paper
Swan, J. E., Singh, G., & Ellis, S. R. (2015). Matching and Reaching Depth Judgments with Real and Augmented Reality Targets. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2015.2459895