The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Data Player: Automatic Generation of Data Videos with Narration-Animation Interplay
Open accessAbstract
Data visualizations and narratives are often integrated to convey data stories effectively. Among various data storytelling formats, data videos have been garnering increasing attention. These videos provide an intuitive interpretation of data charts while vividly articulating the underlying data insights. However, the production of data videos demands a diverse set of professional skills and considerable manual labor, including understanding narratives, linking visual elements with narration segments, designing and crafting animations, recording audio narrations, and synchronizing audio with visual animations. To simplify this process, our paper introduces a novel method, referred to as Data Player, capable of automatically generating dynamic data videos with narration-animation interplay. This approach lowers the technical barriers associated with creating data videos rich in narration. To enable narration-animation interplay, Data Player constructs references between visualizations and text input. Specifically, it first extracts data into tables from the visualizations. Subsequently, it utilizes large language models to form semantic connections between text and visuals. Finally, Data Player encodes animation design knowledge as computational low-level constraints, allowing for the recommendation of suitable animation presets that align with the audio narration produced by text-to-speech technologies. We assessed Data Player's efficacy through an example gallery, a user study, and expert interviews. The evaluation results demonstrated that Data Player can generate high-quality data videos that are comparable to human-composed ones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pioneering tools applying text-to-image models and LLMs were published in VIS 2023 in Oct. 2023.
“there were pioneering ones that apply text-to-image models [41] and LLMs [34, 30, 24] published in VIS 2023 in Oct. 2023.”
From Reflection on Data Storytelling Tools in the Generative AI Era from the Human-AI Collaboration Perspective (2025) · cites this paper as [30]
The paper’s “4.3.2 Linking by an LLM” section describes Data Player as a tool that uses an LLM to link narration with visual elements, supporting its use as an example of an LLM-based tool. The passages in our copy do not establish that it was published at VIS 2023 in October 2023; searches for that venue and date found no confirming passage. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Design Guidelines for Prompt Engineering Text-to-Image Generative Models
Liu, V., & Chilton, L. B. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3501825 · Cited by 639 · cited 1×
“Inspired by existing successful prompt engineering experiences [1, 34], the prompt includes few-shot pre-defined examples for a better illustration of our task.”
BackgroundDesign Guidelines for Prompt Engineering Text-to-Image Generative Models
Liu, V., & Chilton, L. B. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.06977 · Cited by 635
How Does Automation Shape the Process of Narrative Visualization: A Survey of Tools
Chen, Q., Cao, S., Wang, J., & Cao, N. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2023.3261320 · Cited by 71
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 66
- Chatgpt prompt engineering for developers
- Ffmpeg multimedia framework
- Gsap animation platform
- Microsoft azure text-to-speech service
- 10.1145/2702123.2702431 · DOI
- 10.1145/3206505.3206552 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598647 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865119 · DOI
- 10.1145/3544548.3581472 · DOI
- 10.1145/3491102.3517485 · DOI
- 10.1111/cgf.14560 · DOI
- 10.1145/3472749.3474778 · DOI
- 10.1145/3379337.3415814 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01320076 · DOI
- 10.1145/3242587.3242600 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-540-78800-3_24 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3411764.3445452 · DOI
- 10.1111/cgf.14005 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2007.70539 · DOI
- 10.1109/VISUAL.2019.8933695 · DOI
- 10.1145/3210825.3210826 · DOI
- 10.1145/3242587.3242617 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030360 · DOI
- 10.1109/VIS49827.2021.9623291 · DOI
- 10.1145/2556288.2557241 · DOI
- 10.1145/3313831.3376443 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114775 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114802 · DOI
- Li, 2023, Why is AI not a Panacea for Data Workers?, An Interview Study on Human-AI Collaboration in Data Storytelling
- 10.1145/3491102.3502048 · DOI
- 10.1145/3544548.3581470 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2023.3251344 · DOI
- 10.1145/3588942 · DOI
- 10.1145/3544548.3581091 · DOI
- 10.1111/cgf.13195 · DOI
- 10.1145/3172944.3173007 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865240 · DOI
- 10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2017.8031599 · DOI
- 10.1145/3544548.3580964 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_15 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2010.179 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/iV.2018.00075 · DOI
- 10.1145/3584931.3607492 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TVCG.2022.3148007 · DOI
- 10.2312/evs.20211061 · DOI
- 10.1145/3511808.3557159 · DOI
- 10.1007/s41019-022-00195-3 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2023.3238909 · DOI
- 10.1111/cgf.14324 · DOI
- 10.1145/3411764.3445337 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865145 · DOI
- 10.1145/3411764.3445354 · DOI
- 10.1145/3313831.3376593 · DOI
- 10.1111/cgf.13974 · DOI
- 10.1145/3411764.3445747 · DOI
- 10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017 · DOI
- 10.1111/cgf.14325 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209357 · DOI
- Wang, 2023, WonderFlow: Narration-Centric Design of Animated Data Videos, 1
- 10.1109/TVCG.2021.3099002 · DOI
- 10.1145/3491102.3517582 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2023.3286392 · DOI
- 10.1145/2642918.2647398 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209447 · DOI
- 10.1111/cgf.13719 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209369 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Data Playwright: Authoring Data Videos With Annotated Narration
Shen, L., Li, H., Wang, Y., Luo, T., Luo, Y., & Qu, H. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2024.3477926 · Cited by 21
Self-citationNarrative Player: Reviving Data Narratives With Visuals
Shao, Z., Shen, L., Li, H., Shan, Y., Qu, H., Wang, Y., & Chen, S. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2025.3530512 · Cited by 15
Self-citationLee, C., Lin, T., Pfister, H., & Zhu-Tian, C. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2024.3456332 · Cited by 7
Li, H., Wang, Y., & Qu, H. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.02631 · Cited by 10
“However, its taxonomy does not consider how humans work with AI models.”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shen, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., & Wang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
- Cornell University (US)
- Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
- Published
- 2024-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109-119
- ISSN
- 1077-2626 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0506
- 2160-9306
- OpenAlex
- W4388286232
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15
- FWCI
- 4.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Digital Media and Visual Art
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
- Keywords
- data storytelling, automatic video generation, text-to-speech, large language models, audio-video synchronization, data visualization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review