The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
User-Centric View of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Transmission Against Smart Attacks
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems are vulnerable to smart attackers, who are selfish and subjective end-users and use smart radio devices to change their attack types and policies based on the ongoing UAV transmission and network states. In this paper, we apply prospect theory to formulate a subjective smart attack game for the UAV transmission, in which a smart attacker Eve makes subjective decisions to choose the attack type such as jamming, spoofing, and eavesdropping without knowing the attack detection accuracy of the UAV system, and the UAV transmit power on multiple radio channels is chosen to resist smart attacks. Reinforcement-learning-based UAV power allocation strategies are proposed to achieve the optimal power allocation against smart attacks without knowing the attack model and the channel model in the dynamic game. A deep Q-learning-based UAV power allocation strategy combines Q-learning and deep learning to accelerate the learning speed for the case with a large number of channel states and attack modes. Simulation results show that our proposed UAV power allocation strategy can suppress the attack motivation of subjective smart attackers and increase the secrecy capacity and the utility of the UAV system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Cited by
Evolution of Non-Terrestrial Networks From 5G to 6G: A Survey
Azari, M. M., Solanki, S., Chatzinotas, S., Kodheli, O., Sallouha, H., Colpaert, A., Mendoza Montoya, J. F., Pollin, S., Haqiqatnejad, A., Mostaani, A., et al. (2022) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2022.3199901 · Cited by 668
Reinforcement learning for iot security: A comprehensive survey
Uprety, A., & Rawat, D. B. (2021) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3040957 · Cited by 214
Zhang, B., Wang, X., Xie, R., Li, C., Zhang, H., & Jiang, F. (2023) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2022.09.010 · Cited by 43
Applications of Deep Reinforcement Learning in Communications and Networking: A Survey
Luong, N. C., Hoang, D. T., Gong, S., Niyato, D., Wang, P., Liang, Y.-C., & Kim, D. I. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.07862 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiao, L., Xie, C., Min, M., & Zhuang, W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3420-3430
- ISSN
- 0018-9545 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9359
- OpenAlex
- W2776055286
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: User-Centric View of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Transmission Against Smart Attacks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tvt.2017.2785414
- The paper
- Xiao, L., Xie, C., Min, M., & Zhuang, W. (2018). User-Centric View of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Transmission Against Smart Attacks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2017.2785414
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.