The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
UAV Relay in VANETs Against Smart Jamming With Reinforcement Learning
Abstract
Frequency hopping-based antijamming techniques are not always applicable in vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) due to the high mobility of onboard units (OBUs) and the large-scale network topology. In this paper, we use unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to relay the message of an OBU and improve the communication performance of VANETs against smart jammers that observe the ongoing OBU and UAV communication status and even induce the UAV to use a specific relay strategy and then attack it accordingly. More specifically, the UAV relays the OBU message to another roadside unit (RSU) with a better radio transmission condition if the serving RSU is heavily jammed or interfered. The interactions between a UAV and a smart jammer are formulated as an antijamming UAV relay game, in which the UAV decides whether or not to relay the OBU message to another RSU, and the jammer observes the UAV and the VANET strategy and chooses the jamming power accordingly. The Nash equilibria of the UAV relay game are derived to reveal how the optimal UAV relay strategy depends on the transmit cost and the UAV channel model. A hotbooting policy hill climbing-based UAV relay strategy is proposed to help the VANET resist jamming in the dynamic game without being aware of the VANET model and the jamming model. Simulation results show that the proposed relay strategy can efficiently reduce the bit error rate of the OBU message and thus increase the utility of the VANET compared with a Q-learning-based scheme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387
Cited by
Space-Air-Ground Integrated Network: A Survey
Liu, J., Shi, Y., Fadlullah, Z. M., & Kato, N. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2841996 · Cited by 1,281
Evolution of Non-Terrestrial Networks From 5G to 6G: A Survey
Azari, M. M., Solanki, S., Chatzinotas, S., Kodheli, O., Sallouha, H., Colpaert, A., Mendoza Montoya, J. F., Pollin, S., Haqiqatnejad, A., Mostaani, A., et al. (2022) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2022.3199901 · Cited by 668
Future Intelligent and Secure Vehicular Network Toward 6G: Machine-Learning Approaches
Tang, F., Kawamoto, Y., Kato, N., & Liu, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2954595 · Cited by 620
Deep reinforcement learning for cyber security
Nguyen, T. T., & Reddi, V. J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3121870 · Cited by 620
Reinforcement learning for iot security: A comprehensive survey
Uprety, A., & Rawat, D. B. (2021) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3040957 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiao, L., Lu, X., Xu, D., Tang, Y., Wang, L., & Zhuang, W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 4087-4097
- ISSN
- 0018-9545 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9359
- OpenAlex
- W2782363571
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: UAV Relay in VANETs Against Smart Jamming With Reinforcement Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tvt.2018.2789466
- The paper
- Xiao, L., Lu, X., Xu, D., Tang, Y., Wang, L., & Zhuang, W. (2018). UAV Relay in VANETs Against Smart Jamming With Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2018.2789466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.