The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Federated Learning Assisted Multi-UAV Networks
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been recognized as a promising technology to be used in a wide range of civilian, public and military applications. However, given their limited payload and flight time, multiple UAVs may have to be harnessed for accomplishing complex high-level tasks, where a control center can be employed for coordinating their actions. In this article, we consider image classification tasks in UAV-aided exploration scenarios, where the coordination of multiple UAVs is implemented by a ground fusion center (GFC) positioned in a strategic, but inaccessible location, such as a mountain top, where recharging the battery is uneconomical or may even be infeasible. On-board cameras are carried by each UAV and then, federated learning (FL) is invoked for reducing the communication cost between the UAVs and the GFC, and the computational complexity imposed on the GFC. In our proposed FL-aided classification approach, initially local training is performed by each UAV based on the locally collected images to create a local model. Then, each UAV sends its locally acquired model to the GFC via a fading wireless channel, where a global model is generated, which is then fed back to each UAV for the next round of their local training. In order to further minimize the computational complexity imposed on the GFC by the UAVs, weighted zero-forcing (WZF) transmit precoding (TPC) is used at each UAV based on realistic imperfect channel state information (CSI). The system performance attained is evaluated by simulations, showing that the proposed system is capable of attaining a high classification accuracy at relatively low communication cost.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Federated learning can avoid the need for any raw data to be sent from devices/UAVs; only local model updates need to be sent.
“Federated learning can avoid the need for any raw data at all to be sent from devices/UAVs (just local model updates will need to be sent) [34].”
From A Survey on the Convergence of Edge Computing and AI for UAVs: Opportunities and Challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [34]
Citations
Cites
Wireless communications with unmanned aerial vehicles: opportunities and challenges
Zeng, Y., Zhang, R., & Lim, T. J. (2016) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2016.7470933 · Cited by 4,048
Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
(2015) · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9707-1 · Cited by 1,103
Future Intelligent and Secure Vehicular Network Toward 6G: Machine-Learning Approaches
Tang, F., Kawamoto, Y., Kato, N., & Liu, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2954595 · Cited by 620
Ren, J., Wang, H., Hou, T., Zheng, S., & Tang, C. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2919736 · Cited by 185
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- 10.1109/TVT.2019.2920284 · DOI
- 10.1109/GLOBECOM38437.2019.9014313 · DOI
- konecny, 0, Federated optimization: Distributed machine learning for on-device intelligence, arXiv 1610 02527
- konecny, 0, Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency, arXiv 1610 05492
- 10.1109/JSAC.2019.2904348 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2940820 · DOI
- 10.1109/TCOMM.2019.2944169 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TCOMM.2019.2956472 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/LCOMM.2017.2763135 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVT.2017.2753280 · DOI
- 10.1109/LWC.2018.2867775 · DOI
- 10.1109/GLOCOM.2017.8253968 · DOI
- 10.1109/JIOT.2017.2777820 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVT.2019.2912227 · DOI
- 10.1109/JPROC.2019.2909694 · DOI
- 10.1109/LWC.2014.2342736 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVT.2016.2530306 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2897431 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470861813 · DOI
- 10.1109/TCOMM.2018.2864980 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIT.2003.809594 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on the Convergence of Edge Computing and AI for UAVs: Opportunities and Challenges
McEnroe, P., Wang, S., & Liyanage, M. (2022) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2022.3176400 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, H., & Hanzo, L.
- Affiliations
- Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
- University of Southampton (GB)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 14104-14109
- ISSN
- 0018-9545 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9359
- OpenAlex
- W3090837869
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 14
- FWCI
- 10.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (500420837, 505020134)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N004558/1, EP/P034284/1, EP/P003990/1)
- Royal Society's Global Challenges Research
- European Research Council's Advanced Fellow
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › UAV Applications and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Communication Technologies
- Keywords
- federated learning, multi-UAV networks, unmanned aerial vehicles, UAV coordination, image classification, precoding, imperfect channel state information, fading channels, communication cost reduction, computational complexity reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review