Federated Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Resource Allocation of Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications
Abstract
Dynamic topology, fast-changing channels and the time sensitivity of safety-related services present challenges to the status quo of resource allocation for cellular-underlaying vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communications. In this paper, we investigate a novel federated multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (FedMARL) approach for the decentralized joint optimization of channel selection and power control for V2V communication. The approach takes advantage of both deep reinforcement learning (DRL) and federated learning (FL), satisfying the reliability and delay requirements of V2V communication while maximizing the transmit rates of cellular links. Specifically, we elaborately construct individual V2V agent implement by the dueling double deep Q-network (D3QN), and design the reward function to train V2V agents collaboratively. As a result, each agent individually optimizes channel selection and power level based on its local observations, including the instantaneous channel state information (CSI) of corresponding V2V link, the instantaneous co-channel interference from the cellular link, the previous channels selections of nearby V2V pairs, and the queue backlog at the V2V transmitter. Another important aspect is that we incorporate FL to alleviate the training instability problem induced by cooperative multi-agent environment. The local DRL models of different V2V agents are federated periodically, addressing the limitations of partial observability on the entire network status for individual agent, and accelerating the training process of multi-agent learning. Validated via simulations, the proposed FedMARL scheme shows superiority to the baselines in terms of the cellular sum-rate and the V2V packet delivery rate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Integrating FL into DRL allows decentralized vehicular agents to acquire knowledge of the part of the network beyond their observability, thereby addressing the partial observability issue.
“Integrated FL into DRL allows decentralized vehicular agents to acquire knowledge of the part of the network beyond their observability, thereby addressing the partial observability issue [168].”
From Leveraging 3GPP Features and Optimization Techniques for 5G NR-V2X Resource Allocation: A Survey (2025) · cites this paper as [168]
Cites
Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Power Allocation in Wireless Networks
Nasir, Y. S., & Guo, D. (2019) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2019.2933973 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Zhang, X., Peng, M., Yan, S., & Sun, Y. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2962715 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wan, Y., Qu, Y., Ni, W., Xiang, Y., Gao, L., & Hossain, E. (2024) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2024.3361451 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
“…enables a flexible and convenient way of transmitting data from local devices for machine learning applications, such as intelligent transport [59], [60], [61], intelligent marketing [62], intelligent manufacturing [63], smart home [64], intelligent security [65], and intelligent health [66].”
BackgroundSelf-citationResource Allocation in V2X Networks: From Classical Optimization to Machine Learning-Based Solutions
Parvini, M., Schulz, P., & Fettweis, G. (2024) · IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2024.3380509 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Explainable AI-Aided Feature Selection and Model Reduction for DRL-Based V2X Resource Allocation
Khan, N., Abdallah, A., Celik, A., Eltawil, A. M., & Coleri, S. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2025.3554655 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Leveraging 3GPP Features and Optimization Techniques for 5G NR-V2X Resource Allocation: A Survey
Bin Ali Wael, C., Hadj Dogheche, E., Armi, N., Subekti, A., & Dayoub, I. (2025) · IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/ojits.2025.3584024 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Integrated FL into DRL allows decentralized vehicular agents to acquire knowledge of the part of the network beyond their observability, thereby addressing the partial observability issue [168].”
Islam, N., & Zulkernine, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.01089 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Li, X., Lu, L., Ni, W., Jamalipour, A., Zhang, D., & Du, H.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Jiaotong University (CN)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Beijing Sankuai Online Technology Co.,Ltd, Beijing, China
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
- Published
- 2022-08
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 8810-8824
- ISSN
- 0018-9545 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9359
- OpenAlex
- W4285184341
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 10.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61771002)
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2021CZ102)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Keywords
- vehicle-to-vehicle communication, resource allocation, federated learning, multi-agent deep reinforcement learning, channel selection, power control, dueling double deep Q-network, co-channel interference, packet delivery ratio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review