The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ICI mitigation for pilot-aided OFDM mobile systems
Abstract
Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) is robust against frequency selective fading due to the increase of the symbol duration. However, for mobile applications channel time-variations in one OFDM symbol introduce intercarrier-interference (ICI) which degrades the performance. This becomes more severe as mobile speed, carrier frequency or OFDM symbol duration increases. As delay spread increases, symbol duration should also increase in order to maintain a near-constant channel in every frequency subband. Also, due to the high demand for bandwidth, there is a trend toward higher carrier frequencies. Therefore, to have an acceptable reception quality for the applications that experience high delay and Doppler spread, there is a need for ICI mitigation within one OFDM symbol. We introduce two new methods to mitigate ICI in an OFDM system with coherent channel estimation. Both methods use a piece-wise linear model to approximate channel time-variations. The first method extracts channel time-variations information from the cyclic prefix. The second method estimates these variations using the next symbol. We find a closed-form expression for the improvement in average signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) when our mitigation methods are applied for a narrowband time-variant channel. Finally, our simulation results show how these methods would improve the performance in a highly time-variant environment with high delay spread.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes.
Abrahams, J., & Papoulis, A. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288754 · Cited by 16,226
Discrete-Time Signal Processing
Oppenheim, A. V., & Schafer, R. W. (1989) · Cited by 11,775
Microwave Mobile Communications
Jakes, W. C. (1994) · Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers eBooks · doi:10.1109/9780470545287 · Cited by 9,747
Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables
Ortega, J. M., & Rheinboldt, W. C. (2000) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9780898719468 · Cited by 6,860
Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables
I., E., Ortega, J. M., & Rheinboldt, W. C. (1971) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.2307/2004942 · Cited by 4,408
Iterative methods for linear and nonlinear equations
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-4556 · Cited by 1,947
Iterative Methods for Linear and Nonlinear Equations
Kelley, C. T. (1995) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970944 · Cited by 1,635
Cited by
Vehicular Communications: A Physical Layer Perspective
Liang, L., Peng, H., Li, G. Y., & Shen, X. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2017.2750903 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Mostofi, Y., & Cox, D. C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 765-774
- ISSN
- 1536-1276 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111819913
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 23.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ICI mitigation for pilot-aided OFDM mobile systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/twc.2004.840235
- The paper
- Mostofi, Y., & Cox, D. C. (2005). ICI mitigation for pilot-aided OFDM mobile systems. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2004.840235
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.