Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On routing in random Rayleigh fading networks

Haenggi, M.·2005·IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications

Abstract

This paper addresses the routing problem for large wireless networks of randomly distributed nodes with Rayleigh fading channels. First, we establish that the distances between neighboring nodes in a Poisson point process follow a generalized Rayleigh distribution. Based on this result, it is then shown that, given an end-to-end packet delivery probability (as a quality of service requirement), the energy benefits of routing over many short hops are significantly smaller than for deterministic network models that are based on the geometric disk abstraction. If the permissible delay for short-hop routing and long-hop routing is the same, it turns out that routing over fewer but longer hops may even outperform nearest-neighbor routing, in particular for high end-to-end delivery probabilities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/twc.2005.850376

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Haenggi, M.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
Published
2005-07
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
1553-1562
ISSN
1536-1276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149622712
Cited by
177
References
0
FWCI
18.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On routing in random Rayleigh fading networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/twc.2005.850376
The paper
Haenggi, M. (2005). On routing in random Rayleigh fading networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2005.850376

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.