The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sensing-Throughput Tradeoff for Cognitive Radio Networks
Abstract
In a cognitive radio network, the secondary users are allowed to utilize the frequency bands of primary users when these bands are not currently being used. To support this spectrum reuse functionality, the secondary users are required to sense the radio frequency environment, and once the primary users are found to be active, the secondary users are required to vacate the channel within a certain amount of time. Therefore, spectrum sensing is of significant importance in cognitive radio networks. There are two parameters associated with spectrum sensing: probability of detection and probability of false alarm. The higher the probability of detection, the better the primary users are protected. However, from the secondary users' perspective, the lower the probability of false alarm, the more chances the channel can be reused when it is available, thus the higher the achievable throughput for the secondary network. In this paper, we study the problem of designing the sensing duration to maximize the achievable throughput for the secondary network under the constraint that the primary users are sufficiently protected. We formulate the sensing-throughput tradeoff problem mathematically, and use energy detection sensing scheme to prove that the formulated problem indeed has one optimal sensing time which yields the highest throughput for the secondary network. Cooperative sensing using multiple mini-slots or multiple secondary users are also studied using the methodology proposed in this paper. Computer simulations have shown that for a 6 MHz channel, when the frame duration is 100 ms, and the signal-to-noise ratio of primary user at the secondary receiver is -20 dB, the optimal sensing time achieving the highest throughput while maintaining 90% detection probability is 14.2 ms. This optimal sensing time decreases when distributed spectrum sensing is applied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward Dual-Functional Wireless Networks for 6G and Beyond
Liu, F., Cui, Y., Masouros, C., Xu, J., Han, T. X., Eldar, Y. C., & Buzzi, S. (2022) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2022.3156632 · Cited by 3,857
Advances on Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radio Networks: Theory and Applications
Ali, A., & Hamouda, W. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2631080 · Cited by 624
Sparse Representation for Wireless Communications: A Compressive Sensing Approach
Qin, Z., Fan, J., Liu, Y., Gao, Y., & Li, G. Y. (2018) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2018.2789521 · Cited by 247
Sharma, S. K., Bogale, T. E., Le, L. B., Chatzinotas, S., Wang, X., & Ottersten, B. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2773628 · Cited by 248
Analysis of Cognitive Radio Spectrum Sensing Techniques over Nakagami-m Fading Channel
Shaikh, M. S., & Khare, P. K. (2020) · International Journal of Communications · doi:10.46300/9107.2020.14.5 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Liang, Y.-C., Zeng, Y., Peh, E. C. Y., & Hoang, A. T.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1326-1337
- ISSN
- 1536-1276 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084436032
- Cited by
- 2,974
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 284.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensing-Throughput Tradeoff for Cognitive Radio Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/twc.2008.060869
- The paper
- Liang, Y.-C., Zeng, Y., Peh, E. C. Y., & Hoang, A. T. (2008). Sensing-Throughput Tradeoff for Cognitive Radio Networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2008.060869
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.