Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,757

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cell-Free Massive MIMO Versus Small Cells

Open access
Ngo, Hien Quoc, Ashikhmin, Alexei, Yang, Hong, Larsson, Erik G., Marzetta, Thomas L.·2017·IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications

Abstract

A Cell-Free Massive MIMO (multiple-input multiple-output) system comprises a very large number of distributed access points (APs), which simultaneously serve a much smaller number of users over the same time/frequency resources based on directly measured channel characteristics. The APs and users have only one antenna each. The APs acquire channel state information through time-division duplex operation and the reception of uplink pilot signals transmitted by the users. The APs perform multiplexing/de-multiplexing through conjugate beamforming on the downlink and matched filtering on the uplink. Closed-form expressions for individual user uplink and downlink throughputs lead to max-min power control algorithms. Max-min power control ensures uniformly good service throughout the area of coverage. A pilot assignment algorithm helps to mitigate the effects of pilot contamination, but power control is far more important in that regard. Cell-Free Massive MIMO has considerably improved performance with respect to a conventional small-cell scheme, whereby each user is served by a dedicated AP, in terms of both 95%-likely per-user throughput and immunity to shadow fading spatial correlation. Under uncorrelated shadow fading conditions, the cell-free scheme provides nearly fivefold improvement in 95%-likely per-user throughput over the small-cell scheme, and tenfold improvement when shadow fading is correlated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/twc.2017.2655515

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1109/ITA.2009.5044965 · doi:10.1109/ita.2009.5044965
  2. kaltenberger, 2010, Relative channel reciprocity calibration in MIMO/TDD systems, Proc Future Netw Mobile Summit, 1
  3. 10.1109/LWC.2015.2487261 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2015.2487261
  4. 10.1109/MWC.2010.5490981 · doi:10.1109/mwc.2010.5490981
  5. 10.1109/TWC.2014.2355833 · doi:10.1109/twc.2014.2355833
  6. 10.1109/JSTSP.2014.2327594 · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2014.2327594
  7. 10.1109/JSTSP.2014.2309942 · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2014.2309942
  8. 10.1109/GLOCOM.2015.7417147 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2015.7417147
  9. 10.1109/TWC.2015.2399921 · doi:10.1109/twc.2015.2399921
  10. 10.1109/TWC.2007.05207 · doi:10.1109/twc.2007.05207
  11. 10.1109/JSAC.2013.131013 · doi:10.1109/jsac.2013.131013
  12. 10.1109/JSTSP.2014.2322583 · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2014.2322583
  13. 10.1109/ACSSC.2013.6810508 · doi:10.1109/acssc.2013.6810508
  14. 10.1109/TVT.2007.904513 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2007.904513
  15. 10.1109/VETECS.2001.944859 · doi:10.1109/vetecs.2001.944859

Cited by

See all 2,757

Metadata

Authors
Ngo, H. Q., Ashikhmin, A., Yang, H., Larsson, E. G., & Marzetta, T. L.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
Published
2017-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
1834-1850
ISSN
  • 1536-1276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2248
OpenAlex
W2286275639
Cited by
2,757
References
29
FWCI
57.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • ELLIIT

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell-Free Massive MIMO Versus Small Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/twc.2017.2655515
The paper
Ngo, H. Q., Ashikhmin, A., Yang, H., Larsson, E. G., & Marzetta, T. L. (2017). Cell-Free Massive MIMO Versus Small Cells. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2017.2655515

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.