Dictionary Learning-Based Sparse Channel Representation and Estimation for FDD Massive MIMO Systems
Open accessAbstract
This paper addresses the problem of uplink (UL) and downlink (DL) channel estimation in frequency-division duplexing (FDD) massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems. By utilizing the sparse recovery and compressive sensing algorithms, we are able to improve the accuracy of the UL/DL channel estimation and reduce the number of UL/DL pilot symbols. Such successful channel estimation builds upon the assumption that the channel can be sparsely represented under some basis/dictionary. Previous works model the channel using some predefined basis/dictionary; while in this paper, we present a dictionary learning-based channel model such that a dictionary is learned from comprehensively collected channel measurements. The learned dictionary adapts specifically to the cell characteristics and promotes a more efficient and robust channel representation, which in turn improves the performance of the channel estimation. Furthermore, we extend the dictionary learning-based channel model into a joint UL/DL learning framework by observing the reciprocity of the angle of arrival/angle of departure between the UL/DL transmissions and propose a joint channel estimation algorithm that combines the UL and DL received training signals to obtain a more accurate channel estimate. In other words, the DL training overhead, which is a bottleneck in FDD massive MIMO system, can be reduced by utilizing the information from simpler UL training.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hardware support for successive interference cancellation (SIC) at user nodes has been released as a NOMA-chipset.
“The hardware support for such SIC at user nodes is also released as NOMA-chipset [226].”
From Quantum Machine Learning for 6G Communication Networks: State-of-the-Art and Vision for the Future (2019) · cites this paper as [226]
Cites
An Introduction To Compressive Sampling
Candes, E. J., & Wakin, M. B. (2008) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2007.914731 · Cited by 10,017 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum Machine Learning for 6G Communication Networks: State-of-the-Art and Vision for the Future
Nawaz, S. J., Sharma, S. K., Wyne, S., Patwary, M. N., & Asaduzzaman, M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2909490 · Cited by 658 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ding, Y., & Rao, B. D.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5437-5451
- ISSN
- 1536-1276 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2248
- OpenAlex
- W2576906596
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 9.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (CCF-1617365)
- King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (34-988)
- ONR (N00014-18-1-2038)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
- Keywords
- dictionary learning, sparse channel representation, channel estimation, FDD massive MIMO, pilot overhead reduction, sparse signal recovery, compressed sensing, training overhead
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review