Cited by 161Advanced MIMO Systems OptimizationSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling

Dictionary Learning-Based Sparse Channel Representation and Estimation for FDD Massive MIMO Systems

Open access
Ding, Yacong, Rao, Bhaskar D.·2018·IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of uplink (UL) and downlink (DL) channel estimation in frequency-division duplexing (FDD) massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems. By utilizing the sparse recovery and compressive sensing algorithms, we are able to improve the accuracy of the UL/DL channel estimation and reduce the number of UL/DL pilot symbols. Such successful channel estimation builds upon the assumption that the channel can be sparsely represented under some basis/dictionary. Previous works model the channel using some predefined basis/dictionary; while in this paper, we present a dictionary learning-based channel model such that a dictionary is learned from comprehensively collected channel measurements. The learned dictionary adapts specifically to the cell characteristics and promotes a more efficient and robust channel representation, which in turn improves the performance of the channel estimation. Furthermore, we extend the dictionary learning-based channel model into a joint UL/DL learning framework by observing the reciprocity of the angle of arrival/angle of departure between the UL/DL transmissions and propose a joint channel estimation algorithm that combines the UL and DL received training signals to obtain a more accurate channel estimate. In other words, the DL training overhead, which is a bottleneck in FDD massive MIMO system, can be reduced by utilizing the information from simpler UL training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/twc.2018.2843786

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, Y., & Rao, B. D.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
Published
2018-08
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
5437-5451
ISSN
  • 1536-1276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2248
OpenAlex
W2576906596
Cited by
161
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 1
FWCI
9.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (CCF-1617365)
  • King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (34-988)
  • ONR (N00014-18-1-2038)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Keywords
dictionary learning, sparse channel representation, channel estimation, FDD massive MIMO, pilot overhead reduction, sparse signal recovery, compressed sensing, training overhead

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review