Cited by 42Optical Wireless Communication TechnologiesAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsAdvanced Optical Network Technologies

A Wireless Optical Backhaul Solution for Optical Attocell Networks

Open access
Kazemi, Hossein, Safari, Majid, Haas, Harald·2019·IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications

Abstract

The problem of backhauling for optical attocell networks has been approached by a number of wired solutions such as in-building power line communication (PLC), Ethernet, and optical fiber. In this paper, an alternative solution is proposed based on the wireless optical communication in visible light and infrared (IR) bands. A thorough analysis of signal-to-noise-plus-interference ratio (SINR) is elaborated for a multi-user optical attocell network based on the direct current biased optical orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (DCO-OFDM) and decode-and-forward (DF) relaying, taking into account the effects of inter-backhaul and backhaul-to-access interferences. Inspired by concepts developed for radio frequency (RF) cellular networks, full-reuse visible light (FR-VL) and in-band visible light (IB-VL) bandwidth allocation policies are proposed to realize backhauling in the visible light band. The transmission power is opportunistically minimized to enhance the backhaul power efficiency. For a two-tier FR-VL network, there is a technological challenge due to the limited capacity of the bottleneck backhaul link. The IR band is employed to add an extra degree of freedom for the backhaul capacity. For the IR backhaul system, a power-bandwidth trade-off formulation is presented. Closed form analytical expressions are derived for the corresponding power control coefficients. Finally, the network sum rate performance is studied using extensive Monte Carlo simulations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/twc.2018.2883465

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 42

Authors
Kazemi, H., Safari, M., & Haas, H.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
Published
2019-02
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
807-823
ISSN
  • 1536-1276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2248
OpenAlex
W2902952196
Cited by
42
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/R007101/1)
  • Wolfson Foundation
  • Royal Society
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optical Wireless Communication Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Photonic Communication Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Optical Network Technologies
Keywords
optical backhaul, optical wireless communication, visible light communication, infrared communication, DCO-OFDM, decode-and-forward relaying, SINR analysis, bandwidth allocation, power control, sum rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review