Cited by 218Satellite Communication SystemsSpace Satellite Systems and ControlSpacecraft Design and Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultra-Dense LEO Satellite Constellations: How Many LEO Satellites Do We Need?

Deng, Ruoqi, Di, Boya, Zhang, Hongliang, Kuang, Linling, Song, Lingyang·2021·IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications

Abstract

Recently, the ultra-dense low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite constellation over high-frequency band has served as a potential solution for high-capacity backhaul data services. In this paper, we consider an ultra-dense LEO-based terrestrial-satellite network where terrestrial users can access the network through the LEO-assisted backhaul. We aim to minimize the number of satellites in the constellation while satisfying the backhaul requirement of each user terminal (UT). We first derive the average total backhaul capacity of each UT, based on which a three-dimensional constellation optimization algorithm is proposed to minimize the number of satellites in the constellation. Simulation results verify our theoretical capacity analysis and show that for any given coverage ratio requirement, the corresponding optimized LEO satellite constellation can be obtained by the proposed three-dimensional constellation optimization algorithm. Given the same number of deployed LEO satellites, the average coverage ratio of the proposed LEO satellite constellation is at least 10 percentage points higher than that of Telesat constellation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/twc.2021.3062658

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.040 · DOI
  2. cao, 2009, Atmospheric drag perturbation effect on the deployment of tether-assisted deorbit system, Proc Int Conf Mechatronics Autom, 4316
  3. 10.1109/ICIME.2010.5477454 · DOI
  4. jeffrey, 2008, Handbook of Mathematical Formulas and Integrals
  5. bell, 2004, Hypergeometric functions, Special Functions for Scientists and Engineers
  6. grimmett, 2020, Discrete random variables, Probability and Random Processes
  7. ligong, 2009, Relative motion model of satellites formation flying base on the influence of the J2 perturbation, Proc IEEE Int Conf Robot Biomimetics (RoBio), 308
  8. 10.1109/TAES.2003.1261127 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/978-3-319-18842-3_8 · DOI
  10. 10.1145/958491.958496 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/MWC.2019.1800301 · DOI
  12. haenggi, 2013, Sums and products over point processes, Stochastic Geometry for Wireless Networks
  13. 10.1109/49.345881 · DOI
  14. richharia, 2013, Satellite constellations, Mobile Satellite Communications Principles and Trends, 37
  15. 10.1109/TAES.1978.308608 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1109/MILCOM.1993.408677 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/TAES.2008.4655356 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/JPROC.2011.2158766 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/ICCChina.2018.8641172 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/18756891.2016.1204112 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/TWC.2020.3001594 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s11432-017-9362-5 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/TVT.2017.2744800 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/MNET.2014.6963798 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/MWC.001.1900394 · DOI
  26. 2017, Study on New Radio (NR) to Support Non-Terrestrial Networks (Release 15)
  27. 10.1109/JIOT.2020.2997336 · DOI
  28. 10.1109/MWC.001.1900534 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/TWC.2019.2922609 · DOI
  30. wang, 2019, Machine learning for 5G and beyond from model-based to data-driven mobile wireless networks, China Commun, 16, 165
  31. 10.1109/WCNC45663.2020.9120596 · DOI
  32. 10.1109/MWC.2015.7306534 · DOI
  33. 10.1109/CC.2018.8438269 · DOI
  34. 10.1109/LCOMM.2015.2462358 · DOI
  35. 10.1109/ISCID.2017.119 · DOI
  36. 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2735988 · DOI
  37. montenbruck, 2012, Satellite Orbits Models Methods and Applications
  38. 2016, OneWeb Non-Geostationary Satellite System Attachment A

Metadata

Authors
Deng, R., Di, B., Zhang, H., Kuang, L., & Song, L.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
Published
2021-08
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
4843-4857
ISSN
  • 1536-1276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2248
OpenAlex
W3134916744
Cited by
218
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 3
FWCI
14.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFB1804800)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61625101, 61829101, 61941101, 61911540076)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Satellite Communication Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
Keywords
low Earth orbit satellites, satellite backhaul, backhaul capacity, satellite constellation optimization, coverage rate, high-frequency band

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review