Cited by 40Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesImage and Video Quality Assessment

QualityNet: Segmentation quality evaluation with deep convolutional networks

Huang, Chao, Wu, Qingbo, Meng, Fanman·2016·2016 Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP)

Abstract

This paper proposes a deep convolutional network for quality evaluation of object segmentation. In this work, we first present two large-scale datasets for object quality evaluation. The segmentation results of the proposed datasets are generated from simple and complex segmentation datasets respectively. Then, we propose three types of deep convolutional networks to learn object segmentation quality. The weighted mask layer is proposed to utilize both the information of foreground and background. One advantage of our network is that the segmentation quality is evaluated without using the groundtruth segmentation results during test period. This may help us obtain better segmentation result based on the predicted segmentation quality score. The promising results on the proposed datasets indicate the efficiency of our network.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/vcip.2016.7805585

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, C., Wu, Q., & Meng, F.
Affiliations
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
Venue
2016 Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-11
Pages
1-4
OpenAlex
W2575253144
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Visual Communications and Image Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
Keywords
segmentation quality assessment, object segmentation, deep convolutional neural networks, segmentation datasets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review