The DOI matches its Crossref record.
VisTrails: Enabling Interactive Multiple-View Visualizations
Abstract
Figure 1: VisTrails Visualization Spreadsheet. This ensemble shows the surface salinity variation at the mouth of the Columbia River over the period of a day. The green regions represent the fresh-water discharge of the river into the ocean. A single vistrail specification is used to construct this ensemble. Each cell corresponds to an instance of this specification executed using a different timestamp value. VisTrails is a new system that enables interactive multiple-view visualizations by simplifying the creation and maintenance of visualization pipelines, and by optimizing their execution. It provides a general infrastructure that can be combined with existing visualization systems and libraries. A key component of VisTrails is the visualization trail (vistrail), a formal specification of a pipeline. Unlike existing dataflow-based systems, in VisTrails there is a clear separation between the specification of a pipeline and its execution instances. This separation enables powerful scripting capabilities and provides a scalable mechanism for generating a large number of visualizations. VisTrails also leverages the vistrail specification to identify and avoid redundant operations. This optimization is especially useful while exploring multiple visualizations. When variations of the same pipeline need to be executed, substantial speedups can be obtained by caching the results of overlapping subsequences of the pipelines. In this paper, we describe the design and implementation of VisTrails, and show its effectiveness in different application scenarios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A survey on provenance: What for? What form? What from?
Herschel, M., Diestelkämper, R., & Ben Lahmar, H. (2017) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s00778-017-0486-1 · Cited by 300
Provenance Collection Support in the Kepler Scientific Workflow System
Altintas, I., Barney, O., & Jaeger-Frank, E. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11890850_14 · Cited by 269
The Foundations for Provenance on the Web
Moreau, L. (2010) · Foundations and Trends® in Web Science · doi:10.1561/1800000010 · Cited by 168
A systematic review of provenance systems
Pérez, B., Rubio, J., & Sáenz-Adán, C. (2018) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-018-1164-3 · Cited by 66
Tracing Personal Data Using Comics
Schreiber, A., & Struminski, R. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58706-6_36 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Bavoil, L., Callahan, S. P., Scheidegger, C. E., Vo, H. T., Crossno, P. J., Silva, C. T., & Freire, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Visualization 2005 - (VIS'05)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006-01-05
- Pages
- 18-18
- OpenAlex
- W2097284091
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.99
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.