Physical signal-driven fusion for V2X misbehavior detection
Abstract
While source authenticity and message integrity in vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications can be well protected via cryptographic schemes, the validity of shared data raises tremendous concerns. An insider attacker can use a legitimate identity to pass the message authentication and disseminate false reports of information such as its location to the surrounding receivers. Without a reliable filter, the control of a host vehicle can be easily trapped to unexpected situations such as wrong acceleration, and that may lead to a crash, loss of life and assets. This work presents a novel misbehavior detection mechanism that can detect such insider attacks. Unlike prior work, our framework works based on the cooperative efforts of (1) the physical signal-based target tracking engine on the host vehicle and (2) the extensive RSSI-based verification of the presence of the target vehicles with spatial and temporal resolution from reliable entities such as road-side units (RSUs). The target is to verify the senders' presence at their claimed locations, validate the consistency of the trajectory movement, and further re-evaluate the reliability of their V2X messages, even without the applicability of radar and LIDAR (e.g., in a non-LOS area). We also demonstrate the example of using this work in various attack scenarios.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nguyen et al. proposed a target tracking engine that tracks the position and movement trajectory of the target vehicle based on physical RSSI-based verification to verify the presence of the target vehicle at its claimed location.
“Moreover, Nguyen et al. [82] proposed a target tracking engine that tracks the position and movement trajectory of the target vehicle based on physical Latency reduction TCLF [9] Fusion with velocity estimation and prediction Latency reduction FFNet [65] Prediction models utilizing feature flow Latency reduction SyncNet [34] Synchronization with feature-attention and time-modulation Alignment”
From Vehicle-to-Everything Communication in Intelligent Connected Vehicles: A Survey and Taxonomy (2025) · cites this paper as [82]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Nguyen, V.-L., Lin, P.-C., & Hwang, R.-H.
- Affiliations
- National Chung Cheng University (TW)
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-12
- Pages
- 1-4
- OpenAlex
- W3015749557
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Security in Wireless Sensor Networks
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
- Keywords
- vehicle-to-everything communication, insider attacks, misbehavior detection, target tracking, roadside units, message authenticity, trajectory consistency, non-line-of-sight
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review