Cited by 45Image and Video Quality AssessmentMultimedia Communication and TechnologyVideo Coding and Compression Technologies

LiveDeep: Online Viewport Prediction for Live Virtual Reality Streaming Using Lifelong Deep Learning

Feng, Xianglong, Liu, Yao, Wei, Sheng·2020·2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)

Abstract

Live virtual reality (VR) streaming has become a popular and trending video application in the consumer market providing users with 360-degree, immersive viewing experiences. To provide premium quality of experience, VR streaming faces unique challenges due to the significantly increased bandwidth consumption. To address the bandwidth challenge, VR video viewport prediction has been proposed as a viable solution, which predicts and streams only the user’s viewport of interest with high quality to the VR device. However, most of the existing viewport prediction approaches target only the video-on-demand (VOD) use cases, requiring offline processing of the historical video and/or user data that are not available in the live streaming scenario. In this work, we develop a novel viewport prediction approach for live VR streaming, which only requires video content and user data in the current viewing session. To address the challenges of insufficient training data and real-time processing, we propose a live VR-specific deep learning mechanism, namely LiveDeep, to create the online viewport prediction model and conduct real-time inference. LiveDeep employs a hybrid approach to address the unique challenges in live VR streaming, involving (1) an alternate online data collection, labeling, training, and inference schedule with controlled feedback loop to accommodate for the sparse training data; and (2) a mixture of hybrid neural network models to accommodate for the inaccuracy caused…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/vr46266.2020.00104

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DRL can make adaptive decisions based on sequential interactions with the environment in a model-free way.

    “DRL is committed to making adaptive decisions based on sequential interactions with the environment in a model-free way. It has been verified in many practical network environments, such as video streaming, congestion control, load balancing, and resource management [24], [25].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feng, X., Liu, Y., & Wei, S.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Binghamton University (US)
Venue
2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-03
Volume
15
Pages
800-808
ISSN
1087-8270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4243538177
Cited by
45
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Multimedia Communication and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Video Coding and Compression Technologies
Keywords
viewport prediction, bandwidth reduction, online learning, hybrid neural network, sparse training data, real-time inference, head movement, 360-degree video

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review