Cited by 6Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Traffic control and managementRoad Transport and Highway Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Re-Evaluation Strategies for 5G NR V2X Communications

Molina-Galan, Alejandro, Coll-Perales, Baldomero, Gozalvez, Javier·2022·2022 IEEE 96th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2022-Fall)

Abstract

5G NR V2X introduces novel MAC features to support advanced V2X services for connected and automated driving. One of these features is the re-evaluation mechanism designed to detect and avoid packet collisions. The re-evaluation mechanism checks before every transmission if the selected resources are still available. If another vehicle has selected the same resources, the re-evaluation mechanism triggers a reselection of resources. The 3GPP standard defines different strategies for vehicles to decide when to perform a re-evaluation check, and how many times a re-evaluation check should be executed before the transmission of a packet. This study evaluates for the first time the impact of two standard strategies on the operation and performance of NR V2X mode 2. The evaluation demonstrates that the two strategies offer a balance between transmission latency and computational cost. We then propose an alternative re-evaluation check strategy that can simultaneously reduce the transmission latency and computational cost without actually degrading the reliability of NR V2X mode 2 transmissions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/vtc2022-fall57202.2022.10012842

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 2019, TR 37.885 Study on evaluation methodology of new Vehicle-to-Everything use cases for LTE and NR, Tech Rep
  2. molina-galan, 2022, How Does 5G NR V2X Mode 2 Handle periodic Packets and Variable Packet Sizes?, Proc IEEE HPSR 2022, 183
  3. 2019, V2X Functional and Performance Test Report; Test Procedures and Results, Tech Report
  4. 2022, TS 38.214 NR; Physical layer procedure for data (v16.8.0, Release 16), Tech spec
  5. 0, R1-1903180. Link level evaluations of NR PSCCH, 3GPP WG1 Meeting #96
  6. huawei, 2019, R1-1900852. Link level evaluations on sidelink for NR V2X, 3GPP WG1 Ad-Hoc Meeting 1901
  7. 2022, TS 38.321 NR; Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol specification (v16.7.0, Release 16), Tech spec
  8. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3121151 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/COMST.2021.3057017 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Molina-Galan, A., Coll-Perales, B., & Gozalvez, J.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES)
  • Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche,UWICORE laboratory,Elche (Alicante),Spain.
Venue
2022 IEEE 96th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2022-Fall)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-09
Pages
1-5
ISSN
1090-3038 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4317419758
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Road Transport and Highway Systems
Keywords
5G NR-V2X, packet collision avoidance, MAC layer, connected and automated driving, transmission latency, computational cost

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review