X-Ray PoseNet: 6 DoF Pose Estimation for Mobile X-Ray Devices
Abstract
Precise reconstruction of 3D volumes from X-ray projections requires precisely pre-calibrated systems where accurate knowledge of the systems geometric parameters is known ahead. However, when dealing with mobile X-ray devices such calibration parameters are unknown. Joint estimation of the systems calibration parameters and 3d reconstruction is a heavily unconstrained problem, especially when the projections are arbitrary. In industrial applications, that we target here, nominal CAD models of the object to be reconstructed are usually available. We rely on this prior information and employ Deep Learning to learn the mapping between simulated X-ray projections and its pose. Moreover, we introduce the reconstruction loss in addition to the pose loss to further improve the reconstruction quality. Finally, we demonstrate the generalization capabilities of our method in case where poses can be learned on instances of the objects belonging to the same class, allowing pose estimation of unseen objects from the same category, thus eliminating the need for the actual CAD model. We performed exhaustive evaluation demonstrating the quality of our results on both synthetic and real data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pose estimation can be formulated as a supervised regression problem.
“Pose estimation can also be formulated as a supervised regression problem [13, 35].”
From Intraoperative 2D/3D Image Registration via Differentiable X-Ray Rendering (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intraoperative 2D/3D Image Registration via Differentiable X-Ray Rendering
Gopalakrishnan, V., Dey, N., & Golland, P. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01108 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“Pose estimation can also be formulated as a supervised regression problem [13, 35].”
BackgroundMethodRapid patient-specific neural networks for intraoperative X-ray to volume registration
Gopalakrishnan, V., Chlorogiannis, D.-D., Abumoussa, A., Larson, A. M., Haouchine, N., Orbach, D. B., Frisken, S., Dey, N., & Golland, P. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16309 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bui, M., Albarqouni, S., Schrapp, M., Navab, N., & Ilic, S.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Siemens (Germany) (DE)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-03
- Pages
- 1036-1044
- ISSN
- 2472-6737 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2613277324
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
- Keywords
- 6D pose estimation, X-ray tomography, volumetric reconstruction, system calibration, reconstruction loss, unseen object generalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review