The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Unsupervised Feature Learning of Human Actions As Trajectories in Pose Embedding Manifold
Open accessAbstract
An unsupervised human action modeling framework can provide useful pose-sequence representation, which can be utilized in a variety of pose analysis applications. In this work we propose a novel temporal pose-sequence modeling framework, which can embed the dynamics of 3D human-skeleton joints to a latent space in an efficient manner. In contrast to an end-to-end framework explored by previous works, we disentangle the task of individual pose representation learning from the task of learning actions as a sequence of pose embeddings. In order to realize a continuous pose embedding manifold along with better reconstructions, we propose an unsupervised, manifold learning procedure named Encoder GAN, (or EnGAN). Further we use the pose embeddings generated by EnGAN to model human actions using an RNN auto-encoder architecture, PoseRNN. We introduce first-order gradient loss to explicitly enforce temporal regularity in the predicted motion sequence. A hierarchical feature fusion technique is also investigated for simultaneous modeling of local skeleton joints along with global pose variations. We demonstrate state-of-the-art transfer-ability of the learned representation against other supervisedly and unsupervisedly learned motion embeddings for the task of fine-grained action recognition on SBU interaction dataset. Further, we show the qualitative strengths of the proposed framework by visualizing skeleton pose reconstructions and interpolations in pose-embedding space, and low dimensional principal component projections of the reconstructed pose trajectories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 72
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- komura, 2017, A recurrent variational autoencoder for human motion synthesis, 7
- 10.1109/ICCV.2017.115 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCV.2017.161 · DOI
- li, 2017, Auto-conditioned lstm network for extended complex human motion synthesis
- liu, 2016, Spatio-temporal lstm with trust gates for 3d human action recognition, European Conference on Computer Vision, 816
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.391 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.497 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.638 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2016.278 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CVPR.2016.115 · DOI · Paper page
- zhu, 2016, Co-occurrence feature learning for skeleton based action recognition using regularized deep lstm networks, AAAI, 2, 8
- 10.1109/TIP.2016.2552404 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCV.2017.244 · DOI · Paper page
- chunhui, 2017, Pku-mmd: A large scale benchmark for continuous multimodal human action understanding, ACM Multimedia Workshop
- 10.1109/ICCV.2015.494 · DOI
- du, 2015, Hierarchical recurrent neural network for skeleton based action recognition, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1110
- 10.1145/2820903.2820918 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neunet.2005.06.042 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.173 · DOI
- hu, 2017, Temporal perceptive network for skeleton-based action recognition, Proc Brit Mach Vis Conf, 1
- 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298751 · DOI
- shahroudy, 2016, Nturgbd: A large scale dataset for 3d human activity analysis, The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- song, 2017, An end-to-end spatio-temporal attention model for human action recognition from skeleton data, AAAI, 1, 7
- yeh, 2016, Semantic image inpainting with perceptual and contextual losses
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.387 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPRW.2012.6239234 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Kundu, J. N., Gor, M., Uppala, P. K., & Radhakrishnan, V. B.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-01
- Pages
- 1459-1467
- ISSN
- 2472-6737 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2902214002
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
- NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Indian Institute of Science
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Human Motion and Animation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
- Keywords
- unsupervised feature learning, latent space embedding, hierarchical feature fusion, fine-grained action recognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review