Cited by 48Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Deep Interactive Thin Object Selection

Liew, Jun Hao, Cohen, Scott, Price, Brian, Mai, Long, Feng, Jiashi·2021·2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)

Abstract

Existing deep learning based interactive segmentation methods have achieved remarkable performance with only a few user clicks, e.g. DEXTR [32] attaining 91.5% IoU on PASCAL VOC with only four extreme clicks. However, we observe even the state-of-the-art methods would often struggle in cases of objects to be segmented with elongated thin structures (e.g. bug legs and bicycle spokes). We investigate such failures, and find the critical reasons behind are two-fold: 1) lack of appropriate training dataset; and 2) extremely imbalanced distribution w.r.t. number of pixels belonging to thin and non-thin regions. Targeted at these challenges, we collect a large-scale dataset specifically for segmentation of thin elongated objects, named ThinObject-5K. Also, we present a novel integrative thin object segmentation network consisting of three streams. Among them, the high-resolution edge stream aims at preserving fine-grained details including elongated thin parts; the fixed-resolution context stream focuses on capturing semantic contexts. The two streams' outputs are then amalgamated in the fusion stream to complement each other for help producing a refined segmentation output with sharper predictions around thin parts. Extensive experimental results well demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed solution on segmenting thin objects, surpassing the baseline by ~ 30% IoUthindespite using only four clicks. Codes and dataset are available at https://github.com/liewjunhao/thin-object-selection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/wacv48630.2021.00035

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ThinObjects provides both semantic annotations and high-quality, fine-grained segmentation masks, making it suitable for evaluating interactive segmentation under zoom-in conditions.

    “ThinObjects. Following SegAgent(Zhu et al., 2025), we adopt the ThinObjects (Liew et al., 2021) dataset for this task, as it provides both semantic annotations and high-quality, fine-grained segmentation masks, making it suitable for evaluating interactive segmentation under zoom-in conditions.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liew, J. H., Cohen, S., Price, B., Mai, L., & Feng, J.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Adobe Systems (United States) (US)
Venue
2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-01
Pages
305-314
ISSN
2472-6737 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3119387259
Cited by
48
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7
FWCI
2.70
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
interactive segmentation, click-based segmentation, multi-stream network, edge preservation, semantic context, class imbalance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review