Deep Interactive Thin Object Selection
Abstract
Existing deep learning based interactive segmentation methods have achieved remarkable performance with only a few user clicks, e.g. DEXTR [32] attaining 91.5% IoU on PASCAL VOC with only four extreme clicks. However, we observe even the state-of-the-art methods would often struggle in cases of objects to be segmented with elongated thin structures (e.g. bug legs and bicycle spokes). We investigate such failures, and find the critical reasons behind are two-fold: 1) lack of appropriate training dataset; and 2) extremely imbalanced distribution w.r.t. number of pixels belonging to thin and non-thin regions. Targeted at these challenges, we collect a large-scale dataset specifically for segmentation of thin elongated objects, named ThinObject-5K. Also, we present a novel integrative thin object segmentation network consisting of three streams. Among them, the high-resolution edge stream aims at preserving fine-grained details including elongated thin parts; the fixed-resolution context stream focuses on capturing semantic contexts. The two streams' outputs are then amalgamated in the fusion stream to complement each other for help producing a refined segmentation output with sharper predictions around thin parts. Extensive experimental results well demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed solution on segmenting thin objects, surpassing the baseline by ~ 30% IoUthindespite using only four clicks. Codes and dataset are available at https://github.com/liewjunhao/thin-object-selection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ThinObjects provides both semantic annotations and high-quality, fine-grained segmentation masks, making it suitable for evaluating interactive segmentation under zoom-in conditions.
“ThinObjects. Following SegAgent(Zhu et al., 2025), we adopt the ThinObjects (Liew et al., 2021) dataset for this task, as it provides both semantic annotations and high-quality, fine-grained segmentation masks, making it suitable for evaluating interactive segmentation under zoom-in conditions.”
From ACTIVE-o3: Empowering MLLMs with Active Perception via Pure Reinforcement Learning (2025) · cites this paper as Liew et al., 2021
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939 · see citing works
LVIS: A Dataset for Large Vocabulary Instance Segmentation
Gupta, A., Dollar, P., & Girshick, R. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00550 · Cited by 1,274 · see citing works
DeepIGeoS: A Deep Interactive Geodesic Framework for Medical Image Segmentation
Wang, G., Zuluaga, M. A., Li, W., Pratt, R., Patel, P. A., Aertsen, M., Doel, T., David, A. L., Deprest, J., Ourselin, S., et al. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2840695 · Cited by 502 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…in which user clicks first go through Euclidean distance transformation before concatenated with the image for training an FCN. Recent methods focus on better exploiting useful context from user-provided inputs [23, 15, 27] or deriving better representation for user clicks [32, 45, 19, 31].”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhu, M., Tian, Y., Chen, H., Zhou, C., Guo, Q., Liu, Y., Yang, M., & Shen, C. (2025) · 2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.00349 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
ACTIVE-o3: Empowering MLLMs with Active Perception via Pure Reinforcement Learning
Zhu, M., Zhong, H., Zhao, C., Du, Z., Liu, M., Huang, Z., Li, A., Chen, H., Zou, C., Chen, J., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.21457
- Authors
- Liew, J. H., Cohen, S., Price, B., Mai, L., & Feng, J.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Adobe Systems (United States) (US)
- Venue
- 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-01
- Pages
- 305-314
- ISSN
- 2472-6737 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3119387259
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- interactive segmentation, click-based segmentation, multi-stream network, edge preservation, semantic context, class imbalance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review