Graph-Based Traffic Forecasting via Communication-Efficient Federated Learning
Abstract
The existing Federated Learning (FL) systems encounter an enormous communication overhead when employing GNN-based models for traffic forecasting tasks since these models commonly incorporate enormous number of parameters to be transmitted in the FL systems. In this paper, we propose a FL framework, namely, C lustering-based hierarchical and T wo-step- optimized FL (CTFL), to overcome this practical problem. CTFL employs a divide-and-conquer strategy, clustering clients based on the closeness of their local model parameters. Furthermore, we incorporate the particle swarm optimization algorithm in CTFL, which employs a two-step strategy for optimizing local models. This technique enables the central server to upload only one representative local model update from each cluster, thus reducing the communication overhead associated with model update transmission in the FL. Comprehensive case studies on two real-world datasets and two state-of-the-art GNN-based models demonstrate the proposed framework’s outstanding training efficiency and prediction accuracy, and the hyperparameter sensitivity of CTFL is also investigated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clustering techniques based on geographical proximity or model similarity have been applied in [177] to further minimize communication overhead.
“Additionally, clustering techniques based on geographical proximity or model similarity have been applied in [177] to further minimize communication overhead.”
From Privacy-preserving Machine Learning in Internet of Vehicle Applications: Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Direction (2025) · cites this paper as [177]
Cites
Zhang, C., Zhang, S., Yu, J. J. Q., & Yu, S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2021.3055283 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Islam, N., & Zulkernine, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.01089 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, C., Zhang, S., Yu, S., & Yu, J. J. Q.
- Affiliations
- Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- 2022 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-04-10
- Pages
- 2041-2046
- ISSN
- 1525-3511 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4280596682
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
- Keywords
- federated learning, traffic prediction, graph neural networks, communication efficiency, client clustering, particle swarm optimization, hierarchical federated learning, hyperparameter sensitivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review