Occupancy Estimation using WiFi: A Case Study for Counting Passengers on Busses
Abstract
Occupancy estimation in public busses is growing in importance due to its usefulness in planning public transport systems effectively. Bus occupancy data can be used in real time by transport companies to better estimate demand, improve customer satisfaction while also enabling long-term analyses for the purpose of route optimisation. Additionally, in scenarios where busses are used to replace other modes of public transport, such as metropolitan trains during schedule/unscheduled stoppages, occupancy estimation can help operators determine the deployment requirements of replacement busses. In this paper, we present a low cost WiFi-based system for occupancy estimation in busses. In particular, we propose a novel algorithm for occupancy estimation that reduces the problem of overestimation encountered in WiFi-based occupancy estimation approaches. We validate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed algorithm and the WiFi-based occupancy estimation solution via a real-world experiment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CCTV cameras with machine learning achieve a typical precision range of 92-99%.
“CCTV Cameras (with ML) [11,26,32] 92-99%”
From A Review of Passenger Counting in Public Transport Concepts with Solution Proposal Based on Image Processing and Machine Learning (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
Combining probe request data from several Wi-Fi sensors can mitigate overestimation due to external devices.
“The results proved that the overestimation problem due to interference from external devices can be mitigated considerably by combining probe request data from several Wi-Fi sensors.”
From A Review of Passenger Counting in Public Transport Concepts with Solution Proposal Based on Image Processing and Machine Learning (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- Mehmood, U., Moser, I., Jayaraman, P. P., & Banerjee, A.
- Affiliations
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE 5th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-04
- Pages
- 165-170
- OpenAlex
- W2963723682
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT) (publishedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Wireless Networks and Protocols
- Keywords
- passenger counting, low-cost sensing system, route optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review