The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comparison of WirelessHART and ZigBee for industrial applications
Abstract
In this paper we present reasons why ZigBee is not considered suitable for use in most industrial applications, which was also motivation for the development of a new wireless communication standard tailored to the industrial needs: WirelessHART. We also give a short presentation of the design features that makes WirelessHART more suitable for industrial applications and requirements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A survey of routing protocols for smart grid communications
Saputro, N., Akkaya, K., & Uludag, S. (2012) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.03.027 · Cited by 311
Comparative Examination on Architecture and Protocol of Industrial Wireless Sensor Network Standards
Wang, Q., & Jiang, J. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2548360 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Lennvall, T., Svensson, S., & Hekland, F.
- Venue
- 2008 IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2008-05
- Pages
- 85-88
- OpenAlex
- W2137622216
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.15
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of WirelessHART and ZigBee for industrial applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/wfcs.2008.4638746
- The paper
- Lennvall, T., Svensson, S., & Hekland, F. (2008). A comparison of WirelessHART and ZigBee for industrial applications. 2008 IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/wfcs.2008.4638746
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
