Deepfake audio detection by speaker verification
Abstract
Thanks to recent advances in deep leaning, sophisticated generation tools exist, nowadays, that produce extremely realistic synthetic speech. However, malicious uses of such tools are possible and likely, posing a serious threat to our society. Hence, synthetic voice detection has become a pressing research topic, and a large variety of detection methods have been recently proposed. Unfortunately, they hardly generalize to synthetic audios generated by tools never seen in the training phase, which makes they unfit to face real-world scenarios. In this work we aim at overcoming this issue by proposing a new detection approach that leverages only the biometric characteristics of the speaker, with no reference to specific attacks. Since the detector is trained only on real data, generalization is automatically ensured. The proposed approach can be implemented based on off-the-shelf speaker verification tools and we test several such solutions on three popular test sets, obtaining good performance, high generalization ability and high robustness to audio impairment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Current multi-modal and audio-visual deepfake detectors are often based on attention-based fusion of heterogeneous data streams from multiple modalities.
“Current multi-modal deepfake detectors are often based on the attention-based fusion of heterogeneous data streams from multiple modalities.”
From Contextual Cross-Modal Attention for Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection and Localization (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 37 · Cited by 74
- Authors
- Pianese, A., Cozzolino, D., Poggi, G., & Verdoliva, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Naples Federico II (IT)
- Venue
- 2022 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-12-12
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 2157-4774 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4311737082
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 14
- FWCI
- 8.43
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Ministry of Education
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Keywords
- audio deepfake detection, synthetic speech detection, speaker verification, biometric traits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review