Cited by 17Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio ProcessingMusic and Audio Processing

Single and Multi-Speaker Cloned Voice Detection: From Perceptual to Learned Features

Open access
Barrington, Sarah, Barua, Romit, Koorma, Gautham, Farid, Hany·2023·2023 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS)

Abstract

Synthetic-voice cloning technologies have seen significant advances in recent years, giving rise to a range of potential harms. From small- and large-scale financial fraud to disinformation campaigns, the need for reliable methods to differentiate real and synthesized voices is imperative. We describe three techniques for differentiating a real from a cloned voice designed to impersonate a specific person. These three approaches differ in their feature extraction stage with low-dimensional perceptual features offering high interpretability but lower accuracy, to generic spectral features, and end-to-end learned features offering less interpretability but higher accuracy. We show the efficacy of these approaches when trained on a single speaker's voice and when trained on multiple voices. The learned features consistently yield an equal error rate between 0% and 4%, and are reasonably robust to adversarial laundering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/wifs58808.2023.10374911

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Leveraging technologies such as blockchain or privacy-enhancing digital fingerprints can transparently trace content origins.

    “Leveraging technologies such as blockchain (Hasan and Salah 2019), or privacy-enhancing digital fi ngerprints can transparently trace content origins (Barrington et al. 2023).”

    From Generative AI and deepfakes: a human rights approach to tackling harmful content (2024) · cites this paper as Barrington et al. 2023

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrington, S., Barua, R., Koorma, G., & Farid, H.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
2023 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-12-04
Pages
1-6
ISSN
2157-4774 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390489170
Cited by
17
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8
FWCI
3.02
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
UC Berkeley Center For Long-Term Cybersecurity (CLTC)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
anti-spoofing, perceptual features, spectral properties, learned features, adversarial robustness, financial fraud, disinformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review