Cited by 42Simulation Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization AlgorithmsOptimal Experimental Design Methods

Efficient multi-fidelity simulation optimization

Xu, sJie, Zhang, sSi, Huang, sEdward, Chen, sChun-Hung, Lee, sLoo Hay, Celik, sNurcin·2014·Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference 2014

Abstract

Simulation models of different fidelity levels are often available for a complex system. High-fidelity simulations are accurate but time-consuming. Therefore, they can only be applied to a small number of solutions. Low-fidelity simulations are faster and can evaluate a large number of solutions. But their results may contain significant bias and variability. We propose an Multi-fidelity Optimization with Ordinal Transformation and Optimal Sampling (MO2TOS) framework to exploit the benefits of high- and low-fidelity simulations to efficiently identify a (near) optimal solution. MO2TOS uses low-fidelity simulations for all solutions and then assigns a fixed budget of high-fidelity simulations to solutions based on low-fidelity simulation results. We show the benefits of MO2TOS via theoretical analysis and numerical experiments with deterministic simulations and stochastic simulations where noise is negligible with sufficient replications. We compare MO2TOS to Equal Allocation (EA) and Optimal Computing Budget Allocation (OCBA). MO2TOS consistently outperforms both EA and OCBA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/wsc.2014.7020219

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Xu et al. proposed a framework called multi-fidelity optimization with ordinal transformation and optimal sampling (MO2TOS).

    “For instance, Xu, Zhang, Huang, Chen, and Celik (2014) proposed a framework called multi-fidelity optimization with ordinal transformation and optimal sampling (MO2TOS).”

    From Critical analysis of Big Data challenges and analytical methods (2017) · cites this paper as Xu, Zhang, Huang, Chen, and Celik (2014)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, S., Zhang, S., Huang, S., Chen, S.-H., Lee, S. H., & Celik, S.
Affiliations
George Mason University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference 2014
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-12
Pages
3940-3951
ISSN
0891-7736 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4255693858
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
8.94
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Winter Simulation Conference (publishedVersion)
  • Winter Simulation Conference
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
Keywords
multi-fidelity simulation, simulation-based optimization, optimal sampling, high-fidelity simulation, low-fidelity simulation, budget allocation, stochastic simulation, optimal computing budget allocation, equal allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review