The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Positioning of proteins in membranes: A computational approach
Open accessAbstract
A new computational approach has been developed to determine the spatial arrangement of proteins in membranes by minimizing their transfer energies from water to the lipid bilayer. The membrane hydrocarbon core was approximated as a planar slab of adjustable thickness with decadiene‐like interior and interfacial polarity profiles derived from published EPR studies. Applicability and accuracy of the method was verified for a set of 24 transmembrane proteins whose orientations in membranes have been studied by spin‐labeling, chemical modification, fluorescence, ATR FTIR, NMR, cryo‐microscopy, and neutron diffraction. Subsequently, the optimal rotational and translational positions were calculated for 109 transmembrane, five integral monotopic and 27 peripheral protein complexes with known 3D structures. This method can reliably distinguish transmembrane and integral monotopic proteins from water‐soluble proteins based on their transfer energies and membrane penetration depths. The accuracies of calculated hydrophobic thicknesses and tilt angles were ∼1 Å and 2°, respectively, judging from their deviations in different crystal forms of the same proteins. The hydrophobic thicknesses of transmembrane proteins ranged from 21.1 to 43.8 Å depending on the type of biological membrane, while their tilt angles with respect to the bilayer normal varied from zero in symmetric complexes to 26° in asymmetric structures. Calculated hydrophobic boundaries of proteins are located ∼5 Å lower than lipid phosphates and correspond to the zero membrane depth parameter of spin‐labeled residues. Coordinates of all studied proteins with their membrane boundaries can be found in the Orientations of Proteins in Membranes (OPM) database: http://opm.phar.umich.edu/ .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipid–protein interactions in biological membranes: A structural perspective
Lee, A. G. (2003) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/s0005-2736(03)00056-7 · Cited by 886
Permeability of small nonelectrolytes through lipid bilayer membranes
Walter, A., & Gutknecht, J. (1986) · The Journal of Membrane Biology · doi:10.1007/bf01870127 · Cited by 502
Cited by
Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks
Leman, J. K., Weitzner, B. D., Lewis, S. M., Adolf-Bryfogle, J., Alam, N., Alford, R. F., Aprahamian, M., Baker, D., Barlow, K. A., Barth, P., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0848-2 · Cited by 888
Muller, M. P., Jiang, T., Sun, C., Lihan, M., Pant, S., Mahinthichaichan, P., Trifan, A., & Tajkhorshid, E. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00608 · Cited by 282
Coarse-Grained MD Simulations of Membrane Protein-Bilayer Self-Assembly
Scott, K. A., Bond, P. J., Ivetac, A., Chetwynd, A. P., Khalid, S., & Sansom, M. S. P. (2008) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2008.01.014 · Cited by 207
Advances in the Mass Spectrometry of Membrane Proteins: From Individual Proteins to Intact Complexes
Barrera, N. P., & Robinson, C. V. (2011) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-062309-093307 · Cited by 154
Trésaugues, L., Silvander, C., Flodin, S., Welin, M., Nyman, T., Gräslund, S., Hammarström, M., Berglund, H., & Nordlund, P. (2014) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2014.01.013 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Lomize, A. L., Pogozheva, I. D., Lomize, M. A., & Mosberg, H. I.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1318-1333
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2145020089
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Positioning of proteins in membranes: A computational approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1110/ps.062126106
- The paper
- Lomize, A. L., Pogozheva, I. D., Lomize, M. A., & Mosberg, H. I. (2006). Positioning of proteins in membranes: A computational approach. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.062126106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.