The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A structural basis for processivity
Open accessAbstract
The structures of a number of processive enzymes have been determined recently. These proteins remain attached to their polymeric substrates and may perform thousands of rounds of catalysis before dissociating. Based on the degree of enclosure of the substrate, the structures fall into two broad categories. In one group, the substrate is partially enclosed, while in the other class, enclosure is complete. In the latter case, enclosure is achieved by way of an asymmetric structure for some enzymes while others use a symmetrical toroid. In those cases where the protein completely encloses its polymeric substrate, the two are topologically linked and an immediate explanation for processivity is provided. In cases where there is only partial enclosure, the structural basis for processivity is less obvious. There are, for example, pairs of proteins that have quite similar structures but differ substantially in their processivity. It does appear, however, that the enzymes that are processive tend to be those that more completely enclose their substrates. In general terms, proteins that do not use topological restraint appear to achieve processivity by using a large interaction surface. This allows the enzyme to bind with moderate affinity at a multitude of adjacent sites distributed along its polymeric substrate. At the same time, the use of a large interaction surface minimizes the possibility that the enzyme might bind at a small number of sites with much higher affinity, which would interfere with sliding. Proteins that can both slide along a polymeric substrate, and, as well, recognize highly specific sites (e.g., some site‐specific DNA‐binding proteins) appear to undergo a conformational change between the cognate and noncognate‐binding modes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A UbcH5/Ubiquitin Noncovalent Complex Is Required for Processive BRCA1-Directed Ubiquitination
Brzovic, P. S., Lissounov, A., Christensen, D. E., Hoyt, D. W., & Klevit, R. E. (2006) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.008 · Cited by 310
Processivity of Cellobiohydrolases Is Limited by the Substrate
Kurašin, M., & Väljamäe, P. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m110.161059 · Cited by 274
Poyurovsky, M. V., Priest, C., Kentsis, A., Borden, K. L., Pan, Z., Pavletich, N., & Prives, C. (2007) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601465 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Breyer, W. A., & Matthews, B. W.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1699-1711
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W1982168027
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A structural basis for processivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1110/ps.10301
- The paper
- Breyer, W. A., & Matthews, B. W. (2001). A structural basis for processivity. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.10301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.