The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probability‐based protein secondary structure identification using combined NMR chemical‐shift data
Open accessAbstract
For a long time, NMR chemical shifts have been used to identify protein secondary structures. Currently, this is accomplished through comparing the observed 1 H α, 13 C α, 13 C β, or 13 C′ chemical shifts with the random coil values. Here, we present a new protocol, which is based on the joint probability of each of the three secondary structural types (β‐strand, α‐helix, and random coil) derived from chemical‐shift data, to identify the secondary structure. In combination with empirical smooth filters/functions, this protocol shows significant improvements in the accuracy and the confidence of identification. Updated chemical‐shift statistics are reported, on the basis of which the reliability of using chemical shift to identify protein secondary structure is evaluated for each nucleus. The reliability varies greatly among the 20 amino acids, but, on average, is in the order of: 13 C α>13 C′>1 H α>13 C β>15 N>1 H N to distinguish an α‐helix from a random coil; and 1 H α>13 C β >1 H N ∼13 C α∼13 C′∼15 N for a β‐strand from a random coil. Amide 15 N and 1 H N chemical shifts, which are generally excluded from the application, in fact, were found to be helpful in distinguishing a β‐strand from a random coil. In addition, the chemical‐shift statistical data are compared with those reported previously, and the results are discussed. A JAVA User Interface program has been developed to make the entire procedure fully automated and is available via http://ccsr3150‐p3.stanford.edu.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
Cited by
Teixobactin kills bacteria by a two-pronged attack on the cell envelope
Shukla, R., Lavore, F., Maity, S., Derks, M. G. N., Jones, C. R., Vermeulen, B. J. A., Melcrová, A., Morris, M. A., Becker, L. M., Wang, X., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05019-y · Cited by 201
Cysteine oxidation triggers amyloid fibril formation of the tumor suppressor p16INK4A
Göbl, C., Morris, V. K., van Dam, L., Visscher, M., Polderman, P. E., Hartlmüller, C., de Ruiter, H., Hora, M., Liesinger, L., Birner-Gruenberger, R., et al. (2020) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2019.101316 · Cited by 29
Berbon, M., Martinez, D., Morvan, E., Grélard, A., Kauffmann, B., Waeytens, J., Wien, F., Arluison, V., & Habenstein, B. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05462-1 · Cited by 14
Chiliveri, S. C., Louis, J. M., Best, R. B., & Bax, A. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167683 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., & Jardetzky, O.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 852-861
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2170823043
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.