Cited by 1Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryBreast Lesions and Carcinomas

Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS)

Open access
Kwak, Jin Young·2013·Journal of Korean Thyroid Association

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) is the best diagnostic choice for thyroid nodules.Recently, the thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TIRADS) has been developed for risk stratification of thyroid nodules using various US features, similar to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for evaluating breast lesions.The reporting system can allow effective communication between the reporting doctors, such as radiologists, cytologists, and clinicians using standardization and simplification of the reports.In this review, I discuss several TIRADS systems developed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11106/jkta.2013.6.2.106

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reporting and Data Systems (RADS) were developed to standardize imaging reports for various organs, especially focusing on cancer detection, providing structured reporting formats and risk stratification to improve communication between radiologists and referring clinicians.

    “Similarly, the Reporting and Data Systems (RADS) were developed to standardize imaging reports for various organs, especially focusing on cancer detection, providing structured reporting formats and risk stratification to improve communication between radiologists and referring clinicians [161,162].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 1

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Kwak JY, Han KH, Yoon JH, Moon HJ, Son EJ, Park SH, et al. Thyroid imaging reporting and data system for US features of nodules: a step in establishing better stratification of cancer risk. Radiology 2011;260(3):892-9.
  2. Park JY, Lee HJ, Jang HW, Kim HK, Yi JH, Lee W, et al. A proposal for a thyroid imaging reporting and data system for ultrasound features of thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 2009;19(11): 1257-64.
  3. Hambly NM, Gonen M, Gerst SR, Li D, Jia X, Mironov S, et al. Implementation of evidence-based guidelines for thyroid nodule biopsy: a model for establishment of practice standards. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(3):655-60.
  4. Kwak JY, Jung I, Baek JH, Baek SM, Choi N, Choi YJ, et al. Image reporting and characterization system for ultrasound features of thyroid nodules: multicentric Korean retrospective study. Korean J Radiol 2013;14(1):110-7.
  5. Horvath E, Majlis S, Rossi R, Franco C, Niedmann JP, Castro A, et al. An ultrasonogram reporting system for thyroid nodules stratifying cancer risk for clinical management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94(5):1748-51.
  6. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 2012;22(4):746-57.
  7. Purysko AS, Remer EM, Coppa CP, Leao Filho HM, Thupili CR, Veniero JC. LI-RADS: a case-based review of the new categorization of liver findings in patients with end-stage liver disease. Radiographics 2012;32(7):1977-95.
  8. Amor F, Alcazar JL, Vaccaro H, Leon M, Iturra A. GI-RADS reporting system for ultrasound evaluation of adnexal masses in clinical practice: a prospective multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38(4):450-5.
  9. Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid 2009;19(11):1159-65.
  10. Oertel YC. A pathologist trying to help endocrinologists to interpret cytopathology reports from thyroid aspirates. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87(4):1459-61.
  11. Choi SH, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Kim MJ, Son EJ. Interobserver and intraobserver variations in ultrasound assessment of thyroid nodules. Thyroid 2010;20(2):167-72.
  12. Kim HG, Kwak JY, Kim EK, Choi SH, Moon HJ. Man to man training: can it help improve the diagnostic performances and interobserver variabilities of thyroid ultrasonography in residents? Eur J Radiol 2012;81(3):e352-6.

Authors
Kwak, J. Y.
Affiliations
Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kwak, Jin Young
Venue
Journal of Korean Thyroid Association
Published
2013
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
106
ISSN
2005-162X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032890017
Cited by
1
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
ko
Open access
Locations
Journal of Korean Thyroid Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Keywords
TI-RADS, thyroid nodules, thyroid ultrasound, risk stratification, BI-RADS, standardized reporting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review