Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 632

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

European Journal of Clinical Investigation

Open access
·2010·European Journal of Clinical Investigation
DOI 10.1111/(issn)1365-2362
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The performance of two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) for noninvasive staging was evaluated in 108 patients with chronic liver disease undergoing liver biopsy and compared with transient elastography (TE). 2D-SWE showed a good diagnostic accuracy for significant (≥F2) and severe fibrosis (≥F3) and was excellent for cirrhosis (F4), compared to liver biopsy. TE performed equally well. 2D-SWE optimal cut-off values were 6.5 (≥F2), 9.8 (≥F3) and 13.1 kPa (F4). 2D-SWE can be applied for diagnostic workup in chronic liver disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/(issn)1365-2362

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 632

Metadata

Venue
European Journal of Clinical Investigation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07-29
ISSN
0014-2972 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/(issn)1365-2362
OpenAlex
W4235868462
Cited by
632
References
0
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: European Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/(issn)1365-2362
The paper
European Journal of Clinical Investigation. (2010). European Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1111/(issn)1365-2362

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.