Perceptions of Teachers’ Communicative Style and Students’ Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation
Abstract
This study considers how students’ perceptions of their teachers’ communicative style, particularly the extent to which teachers are perceived to support students’ autonomy and to provide useful feedback about students’ learning progress, are related to students’ extrinsic and intrinsic motivational orientations. It also examines the link between these variables and various language learning outcomes, including effort, anxiety, and language competence. Students registered in a summer French immersion course (N = 78) completed a questionnaire that was used to assess the constructs described above. Correlational analyses determined that stronger feelings of intrinsic motivation were related to positive language learning outcomes, including greater motivational intensity, greater self‐evaluations of competence, and a reduction in anxiety. Moreover, perceptions of the teacher’s communicative style were related to intrinsic motivation, such that the more controlling and the less informative students perceived the teacher to be, the lower students’ intrinsic motivation was. The implications of perceptions of teacher communicative style for motivation and language learning outcomes are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Controlling behaviors from parents and teachers have not been identified as reliable predictors of students' external regulation.
“However, controlling behaviors from parents and teachers have not been identified as reliable predictors of students’ external regulation (Noels et al., 1999).”
From Pathways to Student Motivation: A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents of Autonomous and Controlled Motivations (2022) · cites this paper as Noels et al., 1999
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 41 · Cited by 547
- Authors
- Noels, K. A., Clément, R., & Pelletier, L. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Saskatchewan (CA)
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-34
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W2034199199
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 32.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Luonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Keywords
- student perceptions of teachers, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, student independence, feedback, French immersion, language learning outcomes, language anxiety, self-efficacy, motivational intensity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review