Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,190

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Opportunity Platforms and Safety Nets: Corporate Citizenship and Reputational Risk

Open access
Fombrun, Charles J., Gardberg, Naomi A., Barnett, Michael L.·2000·Business and Society Review

Abstract

It is argued that no simple correlation can be established between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance. The activities that generate CSP do not directly impact the company's financial performance, but instead affect the bottom line via its stock of reputational capital - the financial value of its intangible assets. It is suggested that corporate citizenship programs can be designed to help companies address reputational threats and opportunities to achieve reputational gains while mitigating reputational losses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/0045-3609.00066

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,190

Metadata

Authors
Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Barnett, M. L.
Venue
Business and Society Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-01
Volume
105
Issue
1
Pages
85-106
ISSN
  • 0045-3609 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8594
OpenAlex
W2113562749
Cited by
1,190
References
0
FWCI
13.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Opportunity Platforms and Safety Nets: Corporate Citizenship and Reputational Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/0045-3609.00066
The paper
Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Barnett, M. L. (2000). Opportunity Platforms and Safety Nets: Corporate Citizenship and Reputational Risk. Business and Society Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/0045-3609.00066

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.