The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Statistical Evaluation of Social Network Dynamics
Abstract
A class of statistical models is proposed for longitudinal network data. The dependent variable is the changing (or evolving) relation network, represented by two or more observations of a directed graph with a fixed set of actors. The network evolution is modeled as the consequence of the actors making new choices, or withdrawing existing choices, on the basis of functions, with fixed and random components, that the actors try to maximize. Individual and dyadic exogenous variables can be used as covariates. The change in the network is modeled as the stochastic result of network effects (reciprocity, transitivity, etc.) and these covariates. The existing network structure is a dynamic constraint for the evolution of the structure itself. The models are continuous-time Markov chain models that can be implemented as simulation models. The model parameters are estimated from observed data. For estimating and testing these models, statistical procedures are proposed that are based on the method of moments. The statistical procedures are implemented using a stochastic approximation algorithm based on computer simulations of the network evolution process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Stochastic Approximation Method
Robbins, H., & Monro, S. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729586 · Cited by 9,643
Cited by
Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics
Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004 · Cited by 2,103
Self-citationClustering in weighted networks
Opsahl, T., & Panzarasa, P. (2009) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.002 · Cited by 1,037
Social Networks and Health: Models, Methods, and Applications
Valente, T. W. (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301014.001.0001 · Cited by 933
A Survey of Statistical Network Models
Goldenberg, A., Zheng, A. X., Fienberg, S. E., & Airoldi, E. M. (2010) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000005 · Cited by 819
Cattani, G., & Ferriani, S. (2008) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0350 · Cited by 659
Metadata
- Authors
- Snijders, T. A. B.
- Venue
- Sociological Methodology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 361-395
- ISSN
- 0081-1750 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9531
- OpenAlex
- W2104725117
- Cited by
- 1,203
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Statistical Evaluation of Social Network Dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/0081-1750.00099
- The paper
- Snijders, T. A. B. (2001). The Statistical Evaluation of Social Network Dynamics. Sociological Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.