The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Doubly Bound: The Impact of Gender and Race on the Politics of Black Women
Abstract
Gender has been thought to be less salient than race among black women. Data from two national surveys of black Americans, conducted in 1984 and 1996, show that black women identify as strongly on the basis of their gender as their race, and that these gender and racial identities are mutually reinforcing. Nevertheless, among black women, their identification with their race more powerfully affected their political attitudes than did their identification on the basis of gender, except in instances where the interests of blacks directly conflict with the interests of women. These empirically based findings speak to the issue of why the attitudes of black women toward contemporary gender issues can sharply diverge from those of white women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.
Kenski, H. C., & Zaller, J. R. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074664 · Cited by 5,169
Eulau, H. (1960) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305540012235x · Cited by 4,722
(2024) · doi:10.4135/9781529691627 · Cited by 1,835
When and where I enter : the impact of Black women on race and sex in America
Giddings, P. J. (1985) · Cited by 1,464
Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics.
Harris, W. H., & Dawson, M. C. (1998) · The Journal of Southern History · doi:10.2307/2588107 · Cited by 895
Relative Deprivation and Working Women, 1978-79
Crosby, F. J. (1982) · Harvard Dataverse · doi:10.7910/dvn/rscfe2 · Cited by 801
Group Consciousness and Political Participation
Miller, A. H., Gurin, P., Gurin, G., & Malanchuk, O. (1981) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2110816 · Cited by 776
Essed, P. (1992) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 585
Conover, P. J. (1988) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.2307/2131388 · Cited by 434
Gurin, P. (1985) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/268911 · Cited by 357
Cited by
Stewart, A. J., & McDermott, C. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141537 · Cited by 450
The Ties That Double Bind: Social Roles and Women's Underrepresentation in Politics
TEELE, D. L., KALLA, J., & ROSENBLUTH, F. (2018) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055418000217 · Cited by 382
Simien, E. M. (2005) · Journal of Black Studies · doi:10.1177/0021934704265899 · Cited by 277
The Application of Social Role Theory to the Study of Gender in Politics
Schneider, M. C., & Bos, A. L. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12573 · Cited by 240
The Gender Gap in Political Discussion Group Attendance
Beauvais, E. (2020) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x18000892 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Gay, C., & Tate, K.
- Venue
- Political Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 169-184
- ISSN
- 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9221
- OpenAlex
- W1976323704
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doubly Bound: The Impact of Gender and Race on the Politics of Black Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/0162-895x.00098
- The paper
- Gay, C., & Tate, K. (1998). Doubly Bound: The Impact of Gender and Race on the Politics of Black Women. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00098
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
