Cited by 42Educational Theory and Curriculum StudiesVocational and Entrepreneurial EducationEducation Systems and Policy

Vocational education as general education

Lewis, Theodore·1998·Curriculum Inquiry

Abstract

It is argued that vocational education belongs in the common core of school knowledge. Distinction is made between vocational education for jobs and vocational education about work. It is the latter aspect of the subject that allows the general education claim to be made. The former aspect, it is argued, belongs beyond the secondary school. The resilience of the liberal/vocational divide is reflected upon. So is the “new vocationalism,” which seeks to narrow the divide. The ideas of those who, consistent with Deweyan ideals, have imagined a unitary curriculum that includes vocational knowledge are examined. A three-part rationale for vocational education as general education is then discussed, namely, meaning of work, practical knowledge as knowledge, and situated cognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/0362-6784.00092

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vocational education and academic education had traditionally constituted two separate trajectories stratifying students with low academic promise into vocational education and students with strong academic promise into academic education, along with administering distinct curricula.

    “Vocational education and academic education had traditionally constituted two separate trajectories stratifying students with low academic promise into vocational education and students with strong academic promise into academic education, along with administering distinct curricula (Castellano et al., 2003;Gordon, 2008;Lewis, 1998;Lynch, 2000;Plank, 2001;Scott & Sarkees-Wircenski, 2008).”
  • The literature and prior research on the dual track indicate that the dual track may result in positive long-term student outcomes.

    “In fact, the literature and prior research on the dual track indicate that the dual track may result in positive long-term student outcomes (Lewis, 1998;Lewis & Cheng, 2006;Novel, 2009;Silverberg et al., 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewis, T.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Lewis, Theodore
Venue
Curriculum Inquiry
Published
1998-01
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
283-309
ISSN
  • 0362-6784 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-873X
OpenAlex
W2145257322
Cited by
42
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Curriculum Inquiry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Vocational and Entrepreneurial Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Systems and Policy
Keywords
vocational education, general education, liberal arts, vocationalism, meaning of work, practical knowledge, situated cognition, secondary school curriculum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review