Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: A ‘Practical’ Critique of the Habitus
Abstract
There are two strands in Bourdieu's sociological writings. On the one hand, Bourdieu argues for a theoretical position one might term his “practical theory” which emphasizes virtuosic interactions between individuals. On the other hand, and most frequently, Bourdieu appeals to the concept of the habitus according to which society consists of objective structures and determined—and isolated—individuals. Although Bourdieu believes that the habitus is compatible with his practical theory and overcomes the impasse of objectivism and subjectivism in social theory, neither claim is the case; the habitus is incompatible with his practical theory, and it retreats quickly into objectivism. However, Bourdieu's practical theory does offer a way out of the impasse of objectivism and subjectivism by focussing on the intersubjective interactions between individuals.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Practice theories, especially those relating to Bourdieu, tend to structural theoretical stasis and underestimate the creativity of action.
“Yet practice theories (especially those relating to Bourdieu) tend to a structural theoretical statis and underestimation of the creativity of action (cf.King 2000; Adloff and Jörke 2013).”
From Gifts of Cooperation, Mauss and Pragmatism (2016) · cites this paper as King 2000
Cites
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Patterson, O. (2014) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043123 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Symbolic Power and Organizational Culture
Hallett, T. (2003) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/1467-9558.00181 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Gifts of Cooperation, Mauss and Pragmatism
Adloff, F. (2016) · Routledge · doi:10.4324/9781315692982 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
- Authors
- King, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Corresponding author
- King, Anthony
- ORCID
- King, Anthony
- Venue
- Sociological Theory
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 417-433
- ISSN
- 0735-2751 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9558
- OpenAlex
- W2159337037
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 8.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sociological Theory (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
- Keywords
- Pierre Bourdieu, habitus, practical theory, objectivism, subjectivism, intersubjectivity, critique of Bourdieu
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review