The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Centralization and Decentralization in Administration and Politics: Assessing Territorial Dimensions of Authority and Power
Abstract
Throughout the world, diverse countries are implementing programs of decentralization as a means of promoting both democratic and developmental objectives. Unfortunately, however, scholarship has yet to offer a comprehensive framework within which to assess and reform central‐local relations. This article seeks to overcome the "division of labor" that has long separated analyses of administrative and political structures, and to provide stronger conceptual vocabulary for describing and analyzing the complexities of centralization and decentralization in both administration and politics. After developing two distinct continua of administrative and political centralization/decentralization, the paper then combines them in a single matrix able to highlight the wide range of strategies and outcomes that emerge from the complex interplay of the two spheres. Depending on where a country lies within the matrix, it is argued, strategies of decentralization may do more harm than good. Strategies of devolution are especially problematic in settings with strong local bosses, and should never be attempted without careful analysis of the preexisting character of central‐local ties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-6408 · Cited by 14,307
Political Order in Changing Societies
Huntington, S. P. (1970) · Verfassung in Recht und Übersee · doi:10.5771/0506-7286-1970-2-257 · Cited by 6,333
Kuper, L., & Horowitz, D. L. (1986) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2069338 · Cited by 4,869
Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1990.
Sahlins, P., & Tilly, C. (1991) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/2165292 · Cited by 3,154
Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research
Skocpol, T. (1985) · Bringing the State Back In · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511628283.002 · Cited by 2,370
THE DANGERS OF DECENTRALIZATION
Prud'homme, R. (1995) · The World Bank Research Observer · doi:10.1093/wbro/10.2.201 · Cited by 1,880
Mann, M. (1986) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511570896 · Cited by 1,683
Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success in China
Montinola, G., Qian, Y., & Weingast, B. R. (1995) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.1995.0003 · Cited by 1,328
Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia
Scott, J. C. (1972) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1959280 · Cited by 1,245
The cost of rights: why liberty depends on taxes
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-2228 · Cited by 1,088
Cited by
Axelsen, H., Jensen, J., & Ross, O. (2022) · Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly · doi:10.7250/csimq.2022-31.04 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Hutchcroft, P. D.
- Venue
- Governance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-53
- ISSN
- 0952-1895 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0491
- OpenAlex
- W2125014478
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 53.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Centralization and Decentralization in Administration and Politics: Assessing Territorial Dimensions of Authority and Power. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/0952-1895.00150
- The paper
- Hutchcroft, P. D. (2001). Centralization and Decentralization in Administration and Politics: Assessing Territorial Dimensions of Authority and Power. Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00150
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.