The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Current Developments and Trends in Social and Environmental Auditing, Reporting and Attestation: A Review and Comment
Abstract
This is a discursive paper which attempts to provide a personal review of current and recent developments in social and environmental reporting with particular emphasis on the attestation and auditing implications. The paper takes the essential desirability of social, environmental and sustainability reporting as a crucial element in any well‐functioning democracy as a given. It further assumes that any civilised, but complex, society with pretensions to social justice, that seeks a potentially sustainable future and which wishes to try and rediscover some less exploitative and less insulated relationship with the natural environment, needs social and environmental reporting as one component in redirecting its social and economic organisation. With reporting being such a central issue, the paper further takes good quality attestation of that information as essential to both its reliability and its ability to fulfill its required role in developing transparency and accountability. The paper has three motifs: the need to clarify terminology in the field of social and environmental ‘audits’; the current weakness of attestation practices in the area; and the significant — but unfulfilled — promise offered by professional accounting and auditing education and training. The paper concludes with a call for a substantial re‐think of accounting education and training.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8 · Cited by 1,240
Self-citationCasey, R. J., & Grenier, J. H. (2015) · AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/ajpt-50736 · Cited by 421
Corporate social responsibility assurance and reporting quality: Evidence from restatements
Ballou, B., Chen, P.-C., Grenier, J. H., & Heitger, D. L. (2018) · Journal of Accounting and Public Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2018.02.001 · Cited by 211
Baier, C., Göttsche, M., Hellmann, A., & Schiemann, F. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04719-7 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Gray, R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Auditing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 247-268
- ISSN
- 1090-6738 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1123
- OpenAlex
- W1969587738
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current Developments and Trends in Social and Environmental Auditing, Reporting and Attestation: A Review and Comment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1099-1123.00316
- The paper
- Gray, R. (2000). Current Developments and Trends in Social and Environmental Auditing, Reporting and Attestation: A Review and Comment. International Journal of Auditing. https://doi.org/10.1111/1099-1123.00316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.