Cited by 15Parasites and Host InteractionsImmune cells in cancerLiver physiology and pathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) in regulating macrophage polarization in RAW264.7 cells

Abstract

Schistosomiasis is a zoonotic parasitic disease that is endemic in Asia. Macrophages are mainly involved in the inflammatory response of late schistosoma infection. Our previous study found that C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) expression is significantly increased, and M2 macrophages are activated in schistosome‐induced liver fibrosis mice. However, the role of CHOP in the regulation of macrophage polarization remains to be further studied. Western blotting or quantitative PCR revealed that IL‐4 increased the expression of arginase‐1, macrophage mannose receptor 1, phosphorylation signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (p‐STAT6), Krüppel‐like factor 4 (KLF4), CHOP, and IL‐13 receptor alpha (IL‐13Rα) and induced M2 polarization in RAW264.7 as measured by flow cytometry. Inhibiting STAT6 phosphorylation (AS1517499) reduced the IL‐4‐induced expression of KLF4, CHOP, and IL‐13Rα and also the number of M2 macrophages. The overexpression of CHOP stimulated M2 polarization, but AS1517499 inhibited this effect. CHOP increased the protein expression of KLF4 but did not change the expression of p‐STAT6. Soluble egg antigen (SEA) could promote the IL‐4‐induced protein expression of p‐STAT6, CHOP, and KLF4. Overall, the findings show that SEA can promote the activation of M2 macrophages by causing increased CHOP‐induced KLF4 levels and activation of STAT6 phosphorylation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1348-0421.12937

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1111/pim.12087 · DOI
  2. Li‐Juan Z, 2017, Endemic status of schistosomiasis in People's Republic of China in 2016, Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi, 29, 669
  3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69440-3 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2009.01098.x · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s00436-002-0751-z · DOI
  6. 10.1079/JOH2005307 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.pt.2004.01.004 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00107-4 · DOI
  9. 10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.7303 · DOI
  10. 10.1186/1756-3305-7-122 · DOI
  11. 10.1186/1471-2172-15-12 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/abbs/gmu128 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.phrs.2015.05.004 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/jgh.12481 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/cddis.2015.206 · DOI
  16. 10.1155/2019/5148575 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nri2448 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.10.024 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/eji.201141869 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2011.10.007 · DOI
  21. 10.1186/s13071-014-0608-1 · DOI
  22. 10.4049/jimmunol.1500146 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.intimp.2015.10.017 · DOI
  24. 10.4196/kjpp.2012.16.2.131 · DOI
  25. 10.1074/jbc.M108967200 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/imr.12221 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/mnfr.201800519 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/jpi.12247 · DOI
  29. 10.1152/ajpgi.00482.2007 · DOI
  30. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.917914 · DOI
  31. 10.18632/oncotarget.7870 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/mt.2016.36 · DOI
  33. 10.1074/jbc.M111.338673 · DOI
  34. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01612 · DOI
  35. 10.1074/jbc.M113.545921 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.076 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.01.024 · DOI
  38. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01299 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s11883-012-0240-5 · DOI
  40. 10.1172/JCI45444 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1189/jlb.4A1014-485R · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.acthis.2015.03.012 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/s41598-018-24152-1 · DOI
  44. 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00443 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.11.018 · DOI
  46. 10.5604/17322693.1150133 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Liu, L., Peng, S., Duan, M., Liu, C., Li, L., Zhang, X., Ren, B., & Tian, H.
Affiliations
  • Yangtze University (CN)
  • Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery Wusan Hospital Jingmen China
Corresponding author
  • Ren, Boxu
  • Tian, Hongyang
Venue
Microbiology and Immunology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-10-21
Volume
65
Issue
12
Pages
531-541
ISSN
  • 0385-5600 (ISSN-L)
  • 1348-0421
OpenAlex
W3197756229
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Microbiology and Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81772223)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
C/EBP homologous protein, CHOP, macrophage polarization, M2 macrophages, schistosomiasis, STAT6 phosphorylation, KLF4, IL-4, soluble egg antigen, liver fibrosis, RAW 264.7 macrophages, arginase-1, IL-13 receptor alpha
MeSH terms
RAW 264.7 Cells, Kruppel-Like Factor 4, Mannose Receptor, Animals, Macrophage Activation, Macrophages, STAT6 Transcription Factor, Mice, Transcription Factor CHOP

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review