The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Field testing of modular borehole monitoring with simultaneous distributed acoustic sensing and geophone vertical seismic profiles at Citronelle, Alabama
Abstract
A modular borehole monitoring concept has been implemented to provide a suite of well‐based monitoring tools that can be deployed cost effectively in a flexible and robust package. The initial modular borehole monitoring system was deployed as part of a CO 2 injection test operated by the Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership near Citronelle, Alabama. The Citronelle modular monitoring system transmits electrical power and signals, fibre‐optic light pulses, and fluids between the surface and a reservoir. Additionally, a separate multi‐conductor tubing‐encapsulated line was used for borehole geophones, including a specialized clamp for casing clamping with tubing deployment. The deployment of geophones and fibre‐optic cables allowed comparison testing of distributed acoustic sensing. We designed a large source effort (>64 sweeps per source point) to test fibre‐optic vertical seismic profile and acquired data in 2013. The native measurement in the specific distributed acoustic sensing unit used (an iDAS from Silixa Ltd) is described as a localized strain rate. Following a processing flow of adaptive noise reduction and rebalancing the signal to dimensionless strain, improvement from repeated stacking of the source was observed. Conversion of the rebalanced strain signal to equivalent velocity units, via a scaling by local apparent velocity, allows quantitative comparison of distributed acoustic sensing and geophone data in units of velocity. We see a very good match of uncorrelated time series in both amplitude and phase, demonstrating that velocity‐converted distributed acoustic sensing data can be analyzed equivalent to vertical geophones. We show that distributed acoustic sensing data, when averaged over an interval comparable to typical geophone spacing, can obtain signal‐to‐noise ratios of 18 dB to 24 dB below clamped geophones, a result that is variable with noise spectral amplitude because the noise characteristics are not identical. With vertical seismic profile processing, we demonstrate the effectiveness of downgoing deconvolution from the large spatial sampling of distributed acoustic sensing data, along with improved upgoing reflection quality. We conclude that the extra source effort currently needed for tubing‐deployed distributed acoustic sensing vertical seismic profile, as part of a modular monitoring system, is well compensated by the extra spatial sampling and lower deployment cost as compared with conventional borehole geophones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adaptive noise cancelling: Principles and applications
Widrow, B., Glover, J. R., McCool, J. M., Kaunitz, J., Williams, C. S., Hearn, R. H., Zeidler, J. R., Eugene Dong, Jr., & Goodlin, R. C. (1975) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1975.10036 · Cited by 3,939
Distributed acoustic sensing for reservoir monitoring with vertical seismic profiling
Mateeva, A., Lopez, J., Potters, H., Mestayer, J., Cox, B., Kiyashchenko, D., Wills, P., Grandi, S., Hornman, K., Kuvshinov, B., et al. (2014) · Geophysical Prospecting · doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12116 · Cited by 492
Field testing of fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) for subsurface seismic monitoring
Daley, T. M., Freifeld, B. M., Ajo-Franklin, J., Dou, S., Pevzner, R., Shulakova, V., Kashikar, S., Miller, D. E., Goetz, J., Henninges, J., et al. (2013) · The Leading Edge · doi:10.1190/tle32060699.1 · Cited by 480
Self-citationDistributed Acoustic Sensing – a new tool for seismic applications
Parker, T., Shatalin, S., & Farhadiroushan, M. (2014) · First Break · doi:10.3997/1365-2397.2013034 · Cited by 372
Recent advances in well-based monitoring of CO2 sequestration
Freifeld, B., Daley, T. M., Hovorka, S., et al. (2009) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.296 · Cited by 57
Self-citation
Cited by
Theory of phase transmission fibre-optic deformation sensing
Fichtner, A., Bogris, A., Nikas, T., Bowden, D., Lentas, K., Melis, N. S., Simos, C., Simos, I., & Smolinski, K. (2022) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1093/gji/ggac237 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Daley, T. M., Miller, D. E., Dodds, K., Cook, P., & Freifeld, B. M.
- Venue
- Geophysical Prospecting
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-11-02
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1318-1334
- ISSN
- 0016-8025 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2478
- OpenAlex
- W2150117578
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Field testing of modular borehole monitoring with simultaneous distributed acoustic sensing and geophone vertical seismic profiles at Citronelle, Alabama. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1365-2478.12324
- The paper
- Daley, T. M., Miller, D. E., Dodds, K., Cook, P., & Freifeld, B. M. (2016). Field testing of modular borehole monitoring with simultaneous distributed acoustic sensing and geophone vertical seismic profiles at Citronelle, Alabama. Geophysical Prospecting. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12324
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.