The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Density‐dependent intraspecific aggression regulates survival in northern Yellowstone wolves (Canis lupus)
Abstract
Summary: Understanding the population dynamics of top‐predators is essential to assess their impact on ecosystems and to guide their management. Key to this understanding is identifying the mechanisms regulating vital rates. Determining the influence of density on survival is necessary to understand the extent to which human‐caused mortality is compensatory or additive. In wolves (Canis lupus), empirical evidence for density‐dependent survival is lacking. Dispersal is considered the principal way in which wolves adjust their numbers to prey supply or compensate for human exploitation. However, studies to date have primarily focused on exploited wolf populations, in which density‐dependent mechanisms are likely weak due to artificially low wolf densities. Using 13 years of data on 280 collared wolves in Yellowstone National Park, we assessed the effect of wolf density, prey abundance and population structure, as well as winter severity, on age‐specific survival in two areas (prey‐rich vs. prey‐poor) of the national park. We further analysed cause‐specific mortality and explored the factors driving intraspecific aggression in the prey‐rich northern area of the park. Overall, survival rates decreased during the study. In northern Yellowstone, density dependence regulated adult survival through an increase in intraspecific aggression, independent of prey availability. In the interior of the park, adult survival was less variable and density‐independent, despite reduced prey availability. There was no effect of prey population structure in northern Yellowstone, or of winter severity in either area. Survival was similar among yearlings and adults, but lower for adults older than 6 years. Our results indicate that density‐dependent intraspecific aggression is a major driver of adult wolf survival in northern Yellowstone, suggesting intrinsic density‐dependent mechanisms have the potential to regulate wolf populations at high ungulate densities. When low prey availability or high removal rates maintain wolves at lower densities, limited inter‐pack interactions may prevent density‐dependent survival, consistent with our findings in the interior of the park.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecosystem consequences of wolf behavioural response to climate.
Post, E., Peterson, R. O., Stenseth, N. C., & McLaren, B. E. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44814 · Cited by 420
Landscape heterogeneity shapes predation in a newly restored predator–prey system
Kauffman, M. J., Varley, N., Smith, D. W., Stahler, D. R., MacNulty, D. R., & Boyce, M. S. (2007) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01059.x · Cited by 350 · cited 1×
“In the NR, wolves even shifted their territories away from the best hunting grounds as the degree of overlap between pack territories increased with wolf density (Kauffman et al. 2007).”
BackgroundSelf-citationHABITAT SELECTION BY ELK BEFORE AND AFTER WOLF REINTRODUCTION IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK
MAO, J. S., BOYCE, M. S., SMITH, D. W., SINGER, F. J., VALES, D. J., VORE, J. M., & MERRILL, E. H. (2005) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69[1691:hsbeba]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 260
Self-citationInfluence of harvest, climate and wolf predation on Yellowstone elk, 1961-2004
Vucetich, J. A., Smith, D. W., & Stahler, D. R. (2005) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.14180.x · Cited by 222
Self-citationWinter prey selection and estimation of wolf kill rates in Yellowstone National Park, 1995–2000
SMITH, D. W., DRUMMER, T. D., MURPHY, K. M., GUERNSEY, D. S., & EVANS, S. B. (2004) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0153:wpsaeo]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 191
Self-citationA Seventy‐Year History of Trends in Yellowstone's Northern Elk Herd
EBERHARDT, L. L., WHITE, P. J., GARROTT, R. A., & HOUSTON, D. B. (2007) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2193/2005-770 · Cited by 78
Cited by
Diel predator activity drives a dynamic landscape of fear
Kohl, M. T., Stahler, D. R., Metz, M. C., Forester, J. D., Kauffman, M. J., Varley, N., White, P. J., Smith, D. W., & MacNulty, D. R. (2018) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1313 · Cited by 304
Self-citationHeritability of interpack aggression in a wild pedigreed population of North American grey wolves
vonHoldt, B. M., DeCandia, A. L., Heppenheimer, E., Janowitz‐Koch, I., Shi, R., Zhou, H., German, C. A., Brzeski, K. E., Cassidy, K. A., Stahler, D. R., et al. (2020) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.15349 · Cited by 22
History and Status of Wild Ungulate Populations on the Northern Yellowstone Range
Mosley, J. C., & Mundinger, J. G. (2018) · Rangelands · doi:10.1016/j.rala.2018.10.006 · Cited by 25
Martin, H. W., Mech, L. D., Fieberg, J., Metz, M. C., MacNulty, D. R., Stahler, D. R., & Smith, D. W. (2018) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/cjz-2017-0220 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cubaynes, S., MacNulty, D. R., Stahler, D. R., Quimby, K. A., Smith, D. W., & Coulson, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-05-21
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1344-1356
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2656
- OpenAlex
- W1965223190
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 9.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Density‐dependent intraspecific aggression regulates survival in northern Yellowstone wolves (Canis lupus). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1365-2656.12238
- The paper
- Cubaynes, S., MacNulty, D. R., Stahler, D. R., Quimby, K. A., Smith, D. W., & Coulson, T. (2014). Density‐dependent intraspecific aggression regulates survival in northern Yellowstone wolves (Canis lupus). Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12238
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.