Cited by 299Physiological and biochemical adaptationsEffects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockThermoregulation and physiological responses

Revisiting concepts of thermal physiology: predicting responses of mammals to climate change

Mitchell, Duncan, Snelling, Edward P., Hetem, Robyn S., Maloney, Shane K., Strauss, Willem Maartin, Fuller, Andrea·2018·Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract

The accuracy of predictive models (also known as mechanistic or causal models) of animal responses to climate change depends on properly incorporating the principles of heat transfer and thermoregulation into those models. Regrettably, proper incorporation of these principles is not always evident. We have revisited the relevant principles of thermal physiology and analysed how they have been applied in predictive models of large mammals, which are particularly vulnerable, to climate change. We considered dry heat exchange, evaporative heat transfer, the thermoneutral zone and homeothermy, and we examined the roles of size and shape in the thermal physiology of large mammals. We report on the following misconceptions in influential predictive models: underestimation of the role of radiant heat transfer, misassignment of the role and misunderstanding of the sustainability of evaporative cooling, misinterpretation of the thermoneutral zone as a zone of thermal tolerance or as a zone of sustainable energetics, confusion of upper critical temperature and critical thermal maximum, overestimation of the metabolic energy cost of evaporative cooling, failure to appreciate that the current advantages of size and shape will become disadvantageous as climate change advances, misassumptions about skin temperature and, lastly, misconceptions about the relationship between body core temperature and its variability with body mass in large mammals. Not all misconceptions invalidate the model…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1365-2656.12818

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitchell, D., Snelling, E. P., Hetem, R. S., Maloney, S. K., Strauss, W. M., & Fuller, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • University of South Africa (ZA)
Corresponding author
Fuller, Andrea
Venue
Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-30
Volume
87
Issue
4
Pages
956-973
ISSN
  • 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2656
OpenAlex
W2794158683
Cited by
299
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 6
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Claude Leon Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Keywords
thermal physiology, climate change, large mammals, prediction model, heat transfer, evaporative cooling, thermoneutral zone, homeothermy, radiant heat transfer, body size and shape, upper critical temperature, critical thermal maximum, skin temperature, core body temperature, phenotypic plasticity, epigenetic adaptation, heat tolerance
MeSH terms
Acclimatization, Animals, Body Temperature Regulation, Mammals, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review