Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plant functional diversity and carbon storage – an empirical test in semi‐arid forest ecosystems

Open access
Conti, Georgina, Díaz, Sandra·2013·Journal of Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Carbon storage in vegetation and soil underpins climate regulation through carbon sequestration. Because plant species differ in their ability to capture, store and release carbon, the collective functional characteristics of plant communities (functional diversity) should be a major driver of carbon accumulation in terrestrial ecosystems. Three major components of plant functional diversity could be put forward as drivers of carbon storage in ecosystems: the most abundant functional trait values, the variety of functional trait values and the abundance of particular species that could have additional effects not incorporated in the first two components. We tested for associations between these components and carbon storage across 16 sites in the C haco forest of Argentina under the same climate and on highly similar parental material. The sites differed in their plant functional diversity caused by different long‐term land‐use regimes. We measured six plant functional traits in 27 species and weighted them by the species abundance at each site to calculate the community‐weighted mean (CWM) and the functional divergence (FD var) of each single trait and of multiple traits (FD iv). We also measured plant and soil carbon storage. Using a stepwise multiple regression analysis, we assessed which of the functional diversity components best explained carbon storage. Both CWM and FD var of plant height and wood‐specific gravity, but no leaf traits, were retained as predictors of carbon storage in multiple models. Relationships of FD var of stem traits and FD iv with carbon storage were all negative. The abundance of five species improved the predictive power of some of the carbon storage models. Synthesis. All three major components of plant functional diversity contributed to explain carbon storage. What matters the most to carbon storage in these ecosystems is the relative abundance of plants with tall, and to a lesser extent dense, stems with a narrow range of variation around these values. No consistent link was found between carbon storage and the leaf traits usually associated with plant resource use strategy. The negative association of trait divergence with carbon storage provided no evidence in support to niche complementarity promoting carbon storage in these forest ecosystems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1365-2745.12012

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 96 references

Cited by

See all 422

Metadata

Authors
Conti, G., & Díaz, S.
Venue
Journal of Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-21
Volume
101
Issue
1
Pages
18-28
ISSN
  • 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2745
OpenAlex
W2165223931
Cited by
422
References
96
FWCI
12.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant functional diversity and carbon storage – an empirical test in semi‐arid forest ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1365-2745.12012
The paper
Conti, G., & Díaz, S. (2013). Plant functional diversity and carbon storage – an empirical test in semi‐arid forest ecosystems. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.