The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant apparency, an overlooked driver of associational resistance to insect herbivory
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Herbivore regulation is one of the services provided by plant diversity in terrestrial ecosystems. It has been suggested that tree diversity decreases insect herbivory in forests, but recent studies have reported opposite patterns, indicating that tree diversity can trigger associational resistance or susceptibility. The mechanisms underlying the tree diversity–resistance relationship thus remain a matter of debate. We assessed insect herbivory on pedunculate oak saplings (Quercus robur) in a large‐scale experiment in which we manipulated tree diversity and identity by mixing oaks, birch and pine species. Tree diversity at the plot scale had no effect on damage due to leaf chewers, but abundance of leaf miners decreased with increasing tree diversity. The magnitude of this associational resistance increased with host dilution, consistent with the ‘resource concentration hypothesis’. At a smaller scale, we estimated tree apparency as the difference in total height between focal oak saplings and their nearest neighbouring trees. Levels of oak infestation with leaf miners decreased significantly with decreasing tree apparency. As the probability of having taller neighbours increased with tree diversity, notably due to the increase in the proportion of faster growing nonhost trees, such as birches and pines, tree apparency may be seen as a ‘hidden’, sampling effect of tree diversity. Synthesis. These findings suggest that greater host dilution and lower tree apparency contribute to associational resistance in young trees. They also highlight the importance of taking plant size into account as a covariate, to avoid misleading interpretations about the biodiversity–resistance relationship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A., & Smith, G. M. (2009) · Statistics for Biology and Health · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6 · Cited by 17,963
nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models
Pinheiro, J., R Core Team, & Bates, D. (1999) · CRAN: Contributed Packages · doi:10.32614/cran.package.nlme · Cited by 6,849
Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity
Faith, D. P. (1992) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3 · Cited by 5,693
A distance‐based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits
Laliberté, E., & Legendre, P. (2010) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/08-2244.1 · Cited by 4,341
The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or Defend
Herms, D. A., & Mattson, W. J. (1992) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/417659 · Cited by 4,262
Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments
Loreau, M., & Hector, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35083573 · Cited by 3,528
Root, R. B. (1973) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942161 · Cited by 3,042
Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients
Schielzeth, H. (2010) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00012.x · Cited by 3,027 · cited 2×
“The centring of variables also ensures that the main effects are biologically interpretable, even when involved in interactions (Schielzeth 2010).”
BackgroundMethodCONFRONTING MULTICOLLINEARITY IN ECOLOGICAL MULTIPLE REGRESSION
Graham, M. H. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-3114 · Cited by 2,536
Cited by
Tree Diversity Drives Forest Stand Resistance to Natural Disturbances
Jactel, H., Bauhus, J., Boberg, J., Bonal, D., Castagneyrol, B., Gardiner, B., Gonzalez-Olabarria, J. R., Koricheva, J., Meurisse, N., & Brockerhoff, E. G. (2017) · Current Forestry Reports · doi:10.1007/s40725-017-0064-1 · Cited by 592
Self-citationBiodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application
Loreau, M., Barbier, M., Filotas, E., Gravel, D., Isbell, F., Miller, S. J., Montoya, J. M., Wang, S., Aussenac, R., Germain, R., et al. (2021) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12756 · Cited by 328
Contributions of a global network of tree diversity experiments to sustainable forest plantations
Verheyen, K., Vanhellemont, M., Auge, H., Baeten, L., Baraloto, C., Barsoum, N., Bilodeau-Gauthier, S., Bruelheide, H., Castagneyrol, B., Godbold, D., et al. (2016) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-015-0685-1 · Cited by 277
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Castagneyrol, B., Giffard, B., Péré, C., & Jactel, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-01-14
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 418-429
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2005927842
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 22.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant apparency, an overlooked driver of associational resistance to insect herbivory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1365-2745.12055
- The paper
- Castagneyrol, B., Giffard, B., Péré, C., & Jactel, H. (2013). Plant apparency, an overlooked driver of associational resistance to insect herbivory. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.