The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does functional trait diversity predict above‐ground biomass and productivity of tropical forests? Testing three alternative hypotheses
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Tropical forests are globally important, but it is not clear whether biodiversity enhances carbon storage and sequestration in them. We tested this relationship focusing on components of functional trait biodiversity as predictors. Data are presented for three rain forests in Bolivia, Brazil and Costa Rica. Initial above‐ground biomass and biomass increments of survivors, recruits and survivors + recruits (total) were estimated for trees ≥10 cm d.b.h. in 62 and 21 1.0‐ha plots, respectively. We determined relationships of biomass increments to initial standing biomass (AGBi), biomass‐weighted community mean values (CWM) of eight functional traits and four functional trait variety indices (functional richness, functional evenness, functional diversity and functional dispersion). The forest continuum sampled ranged from ‘slow’ stands dominated by trees with tough tissues and high AGBi, to ‘fast’ stands dominated by trees with soft, nutrient‐rich leaves, lighter woods and lower AGBi. We tested whether AGBi and biomass increments were related to the CWM trait values of the dominant species in the system (the biomass ratio hypothesis), to the variety of functional trait values (the niche complementarity hypothesis), or in the case of biomass increments, simply to initial standing biomass (the green soup hypothesis). CWM s were reasonable bivariate predictors of AGBi and biomass increments, with CWM specific leaf area SLA,CWM leaf nitrogen content,CWM force to tear the leaf,CWM maximum adult height Hmax and CWM wood specific gravity the most important.AGBi was also a reasonable predictor of the three measures of biomass increment. In best‐fit multiple regression models,CWMHmax was the most important predictor of initial standing biomass AGBi. Only leaf traits were selected in the best models for biomass increment;CWM SLA was the most important predictor, with the expected positive relationship. There were no relationships of functional variety indices to biomass increments, and AGBi was the only predictor for biomass increments from recruits. Synthesis. We found no support for the niche complementarity hypothesis and support for the green soup hypothesis only for biomass increments of recruits. We have strong support for the biomass ratio hypothesis.CWMHmax is a strong driver of ecosystem biomass and carbon storage and CWM SLA, and other CWM leaf traits are especially important for biomass increments and carbon sequestration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems.
Tilman, D., Wedin, D., & Knops, J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379718a0 · Cited by 2,803
AIC model selection using Akaike weights
Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Farrell, S. (2004) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03206482 · Cited by 2,684
Diversity and Productivity in a Long-Term Grassland Experiment
Tilman, D., Reich, P. B., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Mielke, T., & Lehman, C. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1060391 · Cited by 2,373
PLANT FUNCTIONAL MARKERS CAPTURE ECOSYSTEM PROPERTIES DURING SECONDARY SUCCESSION
Garnier, E., Cortez, J., Billès, G., Navas, M.-L., Roumet, C., Debussche, M., Laurent, G., Blanchard, A., Aubry, D., Bellmann, A., et al. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-0799 · Cited by 2,313
Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments
Díaz, S., Lavorel, S., de Bello, F., Quétier, F., Grigulis, K., & Robson, T. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704716104 · Cited by 1,658
Self-citationCardinale, B. J., Wright, J. P., Cadotte, M. W., Carroll, I. T., Hector, A., Srivastava, D. S., Loreau, M., & Weis, J. J. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0709069104 · Cited by 1,537
Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species
Gamfeldt, L., Snäll, T., Bagchi, R., Jonsson, M., Gustafsson, L., Kjellander, P., Ruiz-Jaen, M. C., Fröberg, M., Stendahl, J., Philipson, C. D., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2328 · Cited by 1,477
The effect of biodiversity on tree productivity: from temperate to boreal forests
Paquette, A., & Messier, C. (2011) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00592.x · Cited by 924
Zhang, Y., Chen, H. Y. H., & Reich, P. B. (2012) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01944.x · Cited by 799
Cited by
Traits of trees for cooling urban heat islands: A meta-analysis
Rahman, M. A., Stratopoulos, L. M. F., Moser-Reischl, A., Zölch, T., Häberle, K.-H., Rötzer, T., Pretzsch, H., & Pauleit, S. (2020) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106606 · Cited by 471
Teixeira, H. M., Bianchi, F. J. J. A., Cardoso, I. M., Tittonell, P., & Peña-Claros, M. (2021) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2020.107171 · Cited by 86
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Finegan, B., Peña‐Claros, M., de Oliveira, A., Ascarrunz, N., Bret‐Harte, M. S., Carreño‐Rocabado, G., Casanoves, F., Díaz, S., Eguiguren Velepucha, P., Fernandez, F., Licona, J. C., Lorenzo, L., Salgado Negret, B., Vaz, M., & Poorter, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-12-02
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 191-201
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2289032953
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 16.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does functional trait diversity predict above‐ground biomass and productivity of tropical forests? Testing three alternative hypotheses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1365-2745.12346
- The paper
- Finegan, B., Peña‐Claros, M., de Oliveira, A., Ascarrunz, N., Bret‐Harte, M. S., Carreño‐Rocabado, G., Casanoves, F., Díaz, S., Eguiguren Velepucha, P., Fernandez, F., Licona, J. C., Lorenzo, L., Salgado Negret, B., Vaz, M., & Poorter, L. (2015). Does functional trait diversity predict above‐ground biomass and productivity of tropical forests? Testing three alternative hypotheses. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12346
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.