Cited by 6Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryLanguage Development and Disorders

The novel language‐systematic aphasia screening SAPS: screening‐based therapy in combination with computerised home training

Open access
Krzok, Franziska, Rieger, Verena, Niemann, Katharina, Nobis‐Bosch, Ruth, Radermacher, Irmgard, Huber, Walter, Willmes, Klaus, Abel, Stefanie·2018·International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders

Abstract

Background: SAPS—‘Sprachsystematisches Aphasiescreening’—is a novel language‐systematic aphasia screening developed for the German language, which already had been positively evaluated. It offers a fast assessment of modality‐specific psycholinguistic components at different levels of complexity and the derivation of impairment‐based treatment foci from the individual performance profile. However, SAPS has not yet been evaluated in combination with the new SAPS‐based treatment. Aims: To replicate the practicality of SAPS and to investigate the effectiveness of a SAPS‐based face‐to‐face therapy combined with computerised home training in a feasibility study. To examine the soundness of the treatment design, to determine treatment‐induced changes in patient performance as measured by SAPS, to assess parallel changes in communicative abilities, and to differentiate therapy effects achieved by face‐to‐face therapy versus add‐on effects achieved by later home training. Methods & Procedures: Sixteen participants with post‐stroke aphasia (PWAs) were included into the study. They were administered the SAPS and communicative testing before and after the treatment regimen. Each PWA received one therapy session followed by home training per day, with the individual treatment foci being determined according to initial SAPS profile, and duration of treatment and possible change of focus dependent on performance assessed by continuous therapy monitoring. Outcomes & Results: The combination of therapy and home training based on the SAPS was effective for all participants. We showed significant improvements for impairment‐based SAPS performance and, with high inter‐individual variability, in everyday communication. These two main targets of speech and language therapy were correlated and SAPS improvements after therapy were significantly higher than after home training. Conclusions & Implications: SAPS offers the assessment of an individual performance profile in order to derive sufficiently diversified, well‐founded and specific treatment foci and to follow up changes in performance. The appending treatment regimen has shown to be effective for our participants. Thus, the study revealed feasibility of our approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1460-6984.12350

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improvements were consistently reported on expressive-language subscales of standardised assessments including the Western Aphasia Battery and Aachen Aphasia Test across multiple studies.

    “Improvements were also consistently reported on expressive‐language subscales of standardised assessments including the Western Aphasia Battery and Aachen Aphasia Test across multiple studies (Grechuta et al. 2016; Cherney et al. 2021; Krzok et al. 2017).”

    From Exploring the Effectiveness of Technology‐Based Interventions in Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Krzok et al. 2017

    The available passages from our copy identify the Krzok et al. article but report no assessment results. Searches for Aachen Aphasia Test, Western Aphasia Battery, and expressive-language improvements returned no relevant findings, so the attributed improvement cannot be checked against our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krzok, F., Rieger, V., Niemann, K., Nobis‐Bosch, R., Radermacher, I., Huber, W., Willmes, K., & Abel, S.
Affiliations
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
  • Section of Continuous Learning German Association of Logopedics (dbl) Germany
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Abel, Stefanie
Venue
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-08
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
308-323
ISSN
  • 1368-2822 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-6984
OpenAlex
W2768068788
Cited by
6
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
SAPS, aphasia screening, post-stroke aphasia, speech therapy, communication skills, German language
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aphasia, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Language Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Psycholinguistics, Self Care, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Treatment Outcome, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review