The novel language‐systematic aphasia screening SAPS: screening‐based therapy in combination with computerised home training
Open accessAbstract
Background: SAPS—‘Sprachsystematisches Aphasiescreening’—is a novel language‐systematic aphasia screening developed for the German language, which already had been positively evaluated. It offers a fast assessment of modality‐specific psycholinguistic components at different levels of complexity and the derivation of impairment‐based treatment foci from the individual performance profile. However, SAPS has not yet been evaluated in combination with the new SAPS‐based treatment. Aims: To replicate the practicality of SAPS and to investigate the effectiveness of a SAPS‐based face‐to‐face therapy combined with computerised home training in a feasibility study. To examine the soundness of the treatment design, to determine treatment‐induced changes in patient performance as measured by SAPS, to assess parallel changes in communicative abilities, and to differentiate therapy effects achieved by face‐to‐face therapy versus add‐on effects achieved by later home training. Methods & Procedures: Sixteen participants with post‐stroke aphasia (PWAs) were included into the study. They were administered the SAPS and communicative testing before and after the treatment regimen. Each PWA received one therapy session followed by home training per day, with the individual treatment foci being determined according to initial SAPS profile, and duration of treatment and possible change of focus dependent on performance assessed by continuous therapy monitoring. Outcomes & Results: The combination of therapy and home training based on the SAPS was effective for all participants. We showed significant improvements for impairment‐based SAPS performance and, with high inter‐individual variability, in everyday communication. These two main targets of speech and language therapy were correlated and SAPS improvements after therapy were significantly higher than after home training. Conclusions & Implications: SAPS offers the assessment of an individual performance profile in order to derive sufficiently diversified, well‐founded and specific treatment foci and to follow up changes in performance. The appending treatment regimen has shown to be effective for our participants. Thus, the study revealed feasibility of our approach.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Improvements were consistently reported on expressive-language subscales of standardised assessments including the Western Aphasia Battery and Aachen Aphasia Test across multiple studies.
“Improvements were also consistently reported on expressive‐language subscales of standardised assessments including the Western Aphasia Battery and Aachen Aphasia Test across multiple studies (Grechuta et al. 2016; Cherney et al. 2021; Krzok et al. 2017).”
From Exploring the Effectiveness of Technology‐Based Interventions in Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Krzok et al. 2017
The available passages from our copy identify the Krzok et al. article but report no assessment results. Searches for Aachen Aphasia Test, Western Aphasia Battery, and expressive-language improvements returned no relevant findings, so the attributed improvement cannot be checked against our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke
Brady, M. C., Kelly, H., Godwin, J., Enderby, P., & Campbell, P. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000425.pub4 · Cited by 1,159 · see citing works
What people with aphasia want: Their goals according to the ICF
Worrall, L., Sherratt, S., Rogers, P., Howe, T., Hersh, D., Ferguson, A., & Davidson, B. (2011) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.508530 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
Improved language in chronic aphasia after self-delivered iPad speech therapy
Stark, B. C., & Warburton, E. A. (2018) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2016.1146150 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Rehabilitation of Aphasia: More Is Better
Bhogal, S. K., Teasell, R. W., Foley, N. C., & Speechley, M. R. (2003) · Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation · doi:10.1310/rcm8-5tul-nc5d-bx58 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Improving outcomes for persons with aphasia in advanced community-based treatment programs
Aftonomos, L. B., Appelbaum, J. S., & Steele, R. D. (1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.7.1370 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alhejji, B., Cunningham, S., Dorney, S., & Palmer, R. (2026) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1111/1460-6984.70322 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Krzok, F., Rieger, V., Niemann, K., Nobis‐Bosch, R., Radermacher, I., Huber, W., Willmes, K., & Abel, S.
- Affiliations
- RWTH Aachen University (DE)
- Section of Continuous Learning German Association of Logopedics (dbl) Germany
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Abel, Stefanie
- Venue
- International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-11-08
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 308-323
- ISSN
- 1368-2822 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-6984
- OpenAlex
- W2768068788
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- SAPS, aphasia screening, post-stroke aphasia, speech therapy, communication skills, German language
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aphasia, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Language Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Psycholinguistics, Self Care, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Treatment Outcome, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review