Efficacy of a self‐administered treatment using a smart tablet to improve functional vocabulary in post‐stroke aphasia: a case‐series study
Abstract
Background: Aphasia is an acquired language disorder that occurs secondary to brain injury, such as stroke. It causes communication difficulties that have a significant impact on quality of life and social relationships. Although the efficacy of speech–language therapy has been clearly demonstrated in this population, long‐term services are currently limited due to logistical and financial constraints. In this context, the potential contribution of technology, such as smart tablets, is worth exploring, especially to improve vocabulary that is relevant in daily life. Aims: The main aim was to investigate the efficacy of a self‐administered treatment using a smart tablet to improve naming of functional words in post‐stroke anomia. Methods & Procedures: Four adults with post‐stroke aphasia took part in the study. An ABA design with multiple baselines was used to compare naming performances for four equivalent lists: (1) trained with functional words chosen with the participant; (2) trained with words randomly chosen from a picture database; (3) exposed but not trained; and (4) not exposed (control). Outcomes & Results: For all participants, the treatment self‐administered at home (four times/week for 4 weeks) resulted in a significant improvement for both sets of trained words that was maintained 2 months after the end of treatment. Moreover, in two participants, evidence of generalization to conversation was found. Conclusions & Implications: This study confirms the efficacy of using smart tablets to improve naming in post‐stroke aphasia. Although more studies are needed, the use of new technologies is unquestionably a promising approach to improve communication skills in people with aphasia, especially by targeting vocabulary that is relevant to them in their daily lives.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CSLT studies predominantly used personalised word lists and cueing hierarchies to target individual lexical deficits.
“CSLT studies predominantly used personalised word lists and cueing hierarchies to target individual lexical deficits”
From Exploring the Effectiveness of Technology‐Based Interventions in Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Lavoie et al. 2018
Cites
Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U
Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006 · Cited by 1,468 · see citing works
Application of semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia
Boyle, M., & Coelho, C. A. (1995) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0404.94 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Treating naming impairments in aphasia: Findings from a phonological components analysis treatment
Leonard, C., Rochon, E., & Laird, L. (2008) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687030701831474 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Treatment of verb anomia in aphasia: efficacy of self-administered therapy using a smart tablet
Lavoie, M., Routhier, S., Légaré, A., & Macoir, J. (2016) · Neurocase · doi:10.1080/13554794.2015.1051055 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationRouthier, S., Bier, N., & Macoir, J. (2014) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.973361 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ericson, C., Latysheva, A., Poirier, S.-È., & Fossard, M. (2025) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci15020122 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“They allow patients to practice in a familiar environment and eliminate the need to travel between the clinic and home, making it easier for those in rural areas or with physical limitations to continue their SLT. Breaking sessions into multiple parts throughout the day helps reduce fatigue [12].”
Alhejji, B., Cunningham, S., Dorney, S., & Palmer, R. (2026) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1111/1460-6984.70322 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lavoie, M., Bier, N., & Macoir, J.
- Affiliations
- Université Laval (CA)
- Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Macoir, Joël
- Venue
- International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-11-14
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249-264
- ISSN
- 1368-2822 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-6984
- OpenAlex
- W2900526857
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship
- Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Keywords
- post-stroke aphasia, anomia, functional vocabulary, word naming, self-administered therapy, home-based therapy, digital health technologies, speech therapy
- MeSH terms
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Aged, Anomia, Aphasia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Vocabulary, Treatment Outcome, Stroke, Computers, Handheld
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review