Cited by 29Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Efficacy of a self‐administered treatment using a smart tablet to improve functional vocabulary in post‐stroke aphasia: a case‐series study

Lavoie, Monica, Bier, Nathalie, Macoir, Joël·2019·International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders

Abstract

Background: Aphasia is an acquired language disorder that occurs secondary to brain injury, such as stroke. It causes communication difficulties that have a significant impact on quality of life and social relationships. Although the efficacy of speech–language therapy has been clearly demonstrated in this population, long‐term services are currently limited due to logistical and financial constraints. In this context, the potential contribution of technology, such as smart tablets, is worth exploring, especially to improve vocabulary that is relevant in daily life. Aims: The main aim was to investigate the efficacy of a self‐administered treatment using a smart tablet to improve naming of functional words in post‐stroke anomia. Methods & Procedures: Four adults with post‐stroke aphasia took part in the study. An ABA design with multiple baselines was used to compare naming performances for four equivalent lists: (1) trained with functional words chosen with the participant; (2) trained with words randomly chosen from a picture database; (3) exposed but not trained; and (4) not exposed (control). Outcomes & Results: For all participants, the treatment self‐administered at home (four times/week for 4 weeks) resulted in a significant improvement for both sets of trained words that was maintained 2 months after the end of treatment. Moreover, in two participants, evidence of generalization to conversation was found. Conclusions & Implications: This study confirms the efficacy of using smart tablets to improve naming in post‐stroke aphasia. Although more studies are needed, the use of new technologies is unquestionably a promising approach to improve communication skills in people with aphasia, especially by targeting vocabulary that is relevant to them in their daily lives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1460-6984.12439

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lavoie, M., Bier, N., & Macoir, J.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Macoir, Joël
Venue
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-11-14
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
249-264
ISSN
  • 1368-2822 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-6984
OpenAlex
W2900526857
Cited by
29
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship
  • Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
post-stroke aphasia, anomia, functional vocabulary, word naming, self-administered therapy, home-based therapy, digital health technologies, speech therapy
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Aged, Anomia, Aphasia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Vocabulary, Treatment Outcome, Stroke, Computers, Handheld

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review